Difference between revisions of "Talk:Migration Geohash"

From Geohashing
imported>UnwiseOwl
imported>CJ
(My suggestion is reduce the number)
Line 16: Line 16:
 
Unless you counted non-hashers. Then it would merely be unlikely.
 
Unless you counted non-hashers. Then it would merely be unlikely.
 
I have no particular attachment to it... -- [[User:UnwiseOwl|UnwiseOwl]] 04:36, 30 October 2008 (UTC)
 
I have no particular attachment to it... -- [[User:UnwiseOwl|UnwiseOwl]] 04:36, 30 October 2008 (UTC)
 +
 +
I think it's worth leaving, but perhaps consider reducing the number from 50 down to say 15? (ie still a sizeable group, but much more likely). The largest hash we have had here in Sydney had 9 people attend (I met 6 people I didn't already know), and I very nearly got together  group of round 20 for one of the hashes, but plans fell through... --[[User:CJ|CJ]] 13:58, 30 October 2008 (UTC)

Revision as of 13:58, 30 October 2008

Okay, this achievement has been listed on the main page for a long time and no one has wanted it or made a page for it. That's because no one thinks they'll ever see 50 people at a geohash.

So should we delete it, or change it to meeting 50 geohashers, cumulatively, one at a time if necessary? -Robyn 03:50, 30 October 2008 (UTC)

Well, that wouldn't be migration. I figure this could only happen if the hash occurred at a major event, and the count included non-hashers. I like the idea of a meeting hashers award, but see it as something quite different to this.

Hashers in my grat:3

Hashers I've met:1 (It was me)

-- UnwiseOwl 04:09, 30 October 2008 (UTC)

That's what I mean, it's an achievement that no one is going to get unless they live in San Francisco or Boston. No one has wanted to even make a page for it. It's not inspiring anyone. Every time I look at the red link and try to make a page for it I just think "meh." It would be migration if you met the fifty people in different graticules. -Robyn 04:35, 30 October 2008 (UTC)

Unless you counted non-hashers. Then it would merely be unlikely. I have no particular attachment to it... -- UnwiseOwl 04:36, 30 October 2008 (UTC)

I think it's worth leaving, but perhaps consider reducing the number from 50 down to say 15? (ie still a sizeable group, but much more likely). The largest hash we have had here in Sydney had 9 people attend (I met 6 people I didn't already know), and I very nearly got together group of round 20 for one of the hashes, but plans fell through... --CJ 13:58, 30 October 2008 (UTC)