Difference between revisions of "Talk:Rochester, New York"
From Geohashing
imported>Cogit0 |
imported>Cogit0 |
||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
I suggest that if the coordinates land on the other side of the lake (in Canada), the coordinates stand. Odds are not likely that they hit there, and if they do, it would be that much more fun of a trip.[[User:Cogit0|Cogit0]] 18:46, 21 May 2008 (UTC) | I suggest that if the coordinates land on the other side of the lake (in Canada), the coordinates stand. Odds are not likely that they hit there, and if they do, it would be that much more fun of a trip.[[User:Cogit0|Cogit0]] 18:46, 21 May 2008 (UTC) | ||
| + | :Necessary edit has been performed by deejoe[[User:Cogit0|Cogit0]] 20:24, 21 May 2008 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 20:24, 21 May 2008
This particular reticule is mostly the lake. May I suggest that on days that the location is in the lake that the reticule just below Rochester is chosen? Then again I am in the Ithaca reticule, but I don't mind traveling. -Feirgon
- I agree. I added the map and the graticule to the main page, and we aren't left with many choices, while the graticule below us has the finger lakes and some great locations. I suggest that if people are planning on doing it and if the location ends up in the lake, the coordinates shift to the graticule below.Cogit0 18:46, 21 May 2008 (UTC)
I suggest that if the coordinates land on the other side of the lake (in Canada), the coordinates stand. Odds are not likely that they hit there, and if they do, it would be that much more fun of a trip.Cogit0 18:46, 21 May 2008 (UTC)
- Necessary edit has been performed by deejoeCogit0 20:24, 21 May 2008 (UTC)
