Difference between revisions of "Talk:Santa Cruz, California"
From Geohashing
imported>Ted (7/28 & talk-groups) |
imported>Ted |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
Bah! I am bummed to have not learned of this spot until late in the evening, else I would've made it out there. <sigh> | Bah! I am bummed to have not learned of this spot until late in the evening, else I would've made it out there. <sigh> | ||
| − | FWIW, I frequent the [http://groups.google.com/group/sfsj-geohash SF/SJ geohash google group], as I use those as my alternate graticules. Should we start a separate one for Santa Cruz, or just invade theirs? I can't imagine we'd generate MUCH traffic, except on the 1-in-5000 days that our hash-point is on land... | + | FWIW, I frequent the [http://groups.google.com/group/sfsj-geohash SF/SJ geohash google group], as I use those as my alternate graticules. Should we start a separate one for Santa Cruz, or just invade theirs? I can't imagine we'd generate MUCH traffic, except on the 1-in-5000 days that our hash-point is on land... [[User:Ted|Ted]] 15:07, 29 July 2008 (UTC) |
Latest revision as of 15:07, 29 July 2008
7/28 & talk-groups
Bah! I am bummed to have not learned of this spot until late in the evening, else I would've made it out there. <sigh>
FWIW, I frequent the SF/SJ geohash google group, as I use those as my alternate graticules. Should we start a separate one for Santa Cruz, or just invade theirs? I can't imagine we'd generate MUCH traffic, except on the 1-in-5000 days that our hash-point is on land... Ted 15:07, 29 July 2008 (UTC)
