Difference between revisions of "Talk:Washington"
From Geohashing
imported>Thomcat (One blue) |
imported>Basil |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
:Sure, why not! -- [[User:OtherJack|OtherJack]] ([[User talk:OtherJack|talk]]) 17:27, 7 November 2013 (EST) | :Sure, why not! -- [[User:OtherJack|OtherJack]] ([[User talk:OtherJack|talk]]) 17:27, 7 November 2013 (EST) | ||
:With relets Geco down, it has to be done by hand. I know all my points were in Washington, so I checked the others - looks like only [[Lake Cowichan, British Columbia]] would be blue. --[[User:Thomcat|Thomcat]] ([[User talk:Thomcat|talk]]) 18:22, 7 November 2013 (EST) | :With relets Geco down, it has to be done by hand. I know all my points were in Washington, so I checked the others - looks like only [[Lake Cowichan, British Columbia]] would be blue. --[[User:Thomcat|Thomcat]] ([[User talk:Thomcat|talk]]) 18:22, 7 November 2013 (EST) | ||
| + | ::I was doing it by hand anyway. And yeah, only [[Lake Cowichan, British Columbia|Lake Cowichan]] needs to have the blues. ;-) [[User:Basil|Basil]] ([[User talk:Basil|talk]]) 18:44, 7 November 2013 (EST) | ||
Latest revision as of 23:44, 7 November 2013
Some other states/regions use blue in their maps for "graticule has been reached, but not within this state/region". Do we want to do this for Washington? Basil (talk) 17:11, 7 November 2013 (EST)
- Sure, why not! -- OtherJack (talk) 17:27, 7 November 2013 (EST)
- With relets Geco down, it has to be done by hand. I know all my points were in Washington, so I checked the others - looks like only Lake Cowichan, British Columbia would be blue. --Thomcat (talk) 18:22, 7 November 2013 (EST)
- I was doing it by hand anyway. And yeah, only Lake Cowichan needs to have the blues. ;-) Basil (talk) 18:44, 7 November 2013 (EST)
