imported>Ilpadre ("at the coordinates I found a mail printout that read 'prescription free peach tree gayboys have spam at fishnet stockings school free levitra samples masturbate video'. weird.") |
imported>Ilpadre m (sign) |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
I'm fine with any text-based (i.e. accessible) captchas otherwise. I don't like banning anonymous. -- [[User:relet|relet]] 09:05, 7 July 2009 (UTC) | I'm fine with any text-based (i.e. accessible) captchas otherwise. I don't like banning anonymous. -- [[User:relet|relet]] 09:05, 7 July 2009 (UTC) | ||
| − | :Will it be smart enough to recognize an expedition report where the hashpoint is at Pfizer headquarters? ;) | + | :Will it be smart enough to recognize an expedition report where the hashpoint is at Pfizer headquarters? ;) --[[User:Ilpadre|ilpadre]] 09:24, 7 July 2009 (UTC) |
Revision as of 09:24, 7 July 2009
What helped extremely well against any kind of wiki spam in one mediawiki I administer is a silent word blacklist. I.e. you put common spam words (which can be brand names, certain otherwise uncommon html tag parameters, or certain link parts on a blacklist. Whenever one of these words is used, the page is not saved when pressing the save button, but the wiki behaves as if. I run my blacklist on less than ten keywords and haven't seen either spam or user complaints in years. That requires tinkering with the wiki php code though. It wouldn't work if it were a common extension.
I'm fine with any text-based (i.e. accessible) captchas otherwise. I don't like banning anonymous. -- relet 09:05, 7 July 2009 (UTC)
- Will it be smart enough to recognize an expedition report where the hashpoint is at Pfizer headquarters? ;) --ilpadre 09:24, 7 July 2009 (UTC)
