Difference between revisions of "Talk:Land usage"
From Geohashing
imported>Wenslayer (→Requests for scans: +1 for Victoria; linkifying named graticule pages in Robyn's comment) |
imported>Srs0 m (Done now) |
||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
:: +1 for [[Victoria, British Columbia]]. --[[User:Wenslayer|Wenslayer]] 20:23, 17 June 2009 (UTC) | :: +1 for [[Victoria, British Columbia]]. --[[User:Wenslayer|Wenslayer]] 20:23, 17 June 2009 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | ::: I did all of the above requests just now. Obviously way later than asked for, but I just discovered the page. -[[User:Srs0|Srs0]] 14:17, 27 August 2009 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 14:17, 27 August 2009
That's nice. Neat idea. I like the "rather close to a road" interpretation.
Requests for scans
Can I make a request for Land Usage scans of a couple of graticules? I'd like someone to run Cape May, New Jersey again, and Fort Fisher, North Carolina would be much appreciated as well. "kthxbai" -- Jevanyn 18:39, 4 February 2009 (UTC)
- Ooh, yes please, me too, if someone enjoyes running these things. I'd love to see Vancouver, British Columbia, Surrey, British Columbia, Victoria, British Columbia and Fort Nelson, British Columbia get this treatment. -Robyn 18:10, 17 June 2009 (UTC)
- +1 for Victoria, British Columbia. --Wenslayer 20:23, 17 June 2009 (UTC)
- I did all of the above requests just now. Obviously way later than asked for, but I just discovered the page. -Srs0 14:17, 27 August 2009 (UTC)
