Difference between revisions of "Talk:2010-02-07 49 -123"
From Geohashing
imported>Yangman |
imported>Relet |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
Heh, no church indeed. There's something wacky with the Google Maps business/organization/etc labelling around Squamish. I first noticed this a few months ago when it found me a very conveniently placed but clearly illegal and imaginary [http://maps.google.ca/?q=Squamish,+Squamish-Lillooet+Regional+District,+British+Columbia&ie=UTF8&hl=en&cd=1&geocode=FSRW9gIdUdOo-A&split=0&sll=49.891235,-97.15369&sspn=16.71875,56.536561&hq=&hnear=Squamish,+Squamish-Lillooet+Regional+District,+British+Columbia&ll=49.643401,-123.204675&spn=0.006746,0.010815&t=h&z=17 Taco Bell]. [[User:Yangman|Yangman]] 08:55, 8 February 2010 (UTC) | Heh, no church indeed. There's something wacky with the Google Maps business/organization/etc labelling around Squamish. I first noticed this a few months ago when it found me a very conveniently placed but clearly illegal and imaginary [http://maps.google.ca/?q=Squamish,+Squamish-Lillooet+Regional+District,+British+Columbia&ie=UTF8&hl=en&cd=1&geocode=FSRW9gIdUdOo-A&split=0&sll=49.891235,-97.15369&sspn=16.71875,56.536561&hq=&hnear=Squamish,+Squamish-Lillooet+Regional+District,+British+Columbia&ll=49.643401,-123.204675&spn=0.006746,0.010815&t=h&z=17 Taco Bell]. [[User:Yangman|Yangman]] 08:55, 8 February 2010 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | :Heh. It did not look like a church to me when I looked at the sat images, and was rather curious about how you all agreed on a holy hash. :) Does it have a label somewhere that I may have missed? -- [[User:relet|relet]] 13:06, 8 February 2010 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 13:06, 8 February 2010
How I have missed you expedition reports, Robyn! I think I sometimes have more fun reading them than I do on the actual expedition! :D Thepiguy 05:41, 8 February 2010 (UTC)
Heh, no church indeed. There's something wacky with the Google Maps business/organization/etc labelling around Squamish. I first noticed this a few months ago when it found me a very conveniently placed but clearly illegal and imaginary Taco Bell. Yangman 08:55, 8 February 2010 (UTC)
- Heh. It did not look like a church to me when I looked at the sat images, and was rather curious about how you all agreed on a holy hash. :) Does it have a label somewhere that I may have missed? -- relet 13:06, 8 February 2010 (UTC)
