Difference between revisions of "Talk:2011-07-24 47 7"
From Geohashing
imported>Relet |
imported>Relet m |
||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
divorce who might actually prefer to throw the ex-spouse into the active volcano.) [[User:Jiml|Jiml]] 19:59, 24 July 2011 (EDT) | divorce who might actually prefer to throw the ex-spouse into the active volcano.) [[User:Jiml|Jiml]] 19:59, 24 July 2011 (EDT) | ||
| − | [[User:aperfectring|aperfectring]] might not have appreciated that interpretation either when I brought him. -- [[User:relet|relet]] 16:00, 25 July 2011 (EDT) | + | [[User:aperfectring|aperfectring]] might not have appreciated that interpretation either when I [[2011-05-21_52_14|brought]] him. -- [[User:relet|relet]] 16:00, 25 July 2011 (EDT) |
Hm, I can see the ring, but no bare feet. Wasn't it a hobbit after all who carried the ring? :P --[[User:Bierhefe|Bierhefe]] 07:28, 25 July 2011 (EDT) | Hm, I can see the ring, but no bare feet. Wasn't it a hobbit after all who carried the ring? :P --[[User:Bierhefe|Bierhefe]] 07:28, 25 July 2011 (EDT) | ||
Revision as of 20:00, 25 July 2011
Uhm, the ring needs to be destroyed, doesn't it? :-D Honestly, nice mid-air apricot photo and I like the triangulated hobbit map. (Rincewind, to lazy to even login at 22:34 on 07-24-2001.)
I'm sure those who decided to let their wedding band stand in for the ring will be enthused about that version of the rules. :-) (Well, except those who just went through a bitter divorce who might actually prefer to throw the ex-spouse into the active volcano.) Jiml 19:59, 24 July 2011 (EDT)
aperfectring might not have appreciated that interpretation either when I brought him. -- relet 16:00, 25 July 2011 (EDT)
Hm, I can see the ring, but no bare feet. Wasn't it a hobbit after all who carried the ring? :P --Bierhefe 07:28, 25 July 2011 (EDT)
