Difference between revisions of "Talk:Subdivision geohash achievement"

From Geohashing
m (+1)
m (forgot I was not on a Wikimedia site)
Line 7: Line 7:
 
:Another example that comes to mind is [[Michael5000/maps#The Oregon and Washington Counties|Michael5000's map]] of counties in Oregon and Washington. I actually considered a similar idea for the twelve Administrative Okrugs of Moscow, though never formulated it on my (rudimentary) user page. --[[User:January First-of-May|January First-of-May]] ([[User talk:January First-of-May|talk]]) 12:35, 1 September 2020 (UTC)
 
:Another example that comes to mind is [[Michael5000/maps#The Oregon and Washington Counties|Michael5000's map]] of counties in Oregon and Washington. I actually considered a similar idea for the twelve Administrative Okrugs of Moscow, though never formulated it on my (rudimentary) user page. --[[User:January First-of-May|January First-of-May]] ([[User talk:January First-of-May|talk]]) 12:35, 1 September 2020 (UTC)
  
:{{support}}! So for me it would be 50 states in my nation (or 48 contiguous), 33 counties in my state, 33 census-designated places in my county ([[wikipedia:Santa_Fe_County,_New_Mexico#Communities]])... [[User:Arlo|Arlo]] ([[User talk:Arlo|talk]]) 15:28, 1 September 2020 (UTC)
+
:'''Support'''! So for me it would be 50 states in my nation (or 48 contiguous), 33 counties in my state, 33 census-designated places in my county ([[wikipedia:Santa_Fe_County,_New_Mexico#Communities]])... [[User:Arlo|Arlo]] ([[User talk:Arlo|talk]]) 15:28, 1 September 2020 (UTC)

Revision as of 15:29, 1 September 2020

This is a proposal made on 2020-09-01. Please leave comments and suggestions below, indicating your thoughts on the proposal, including:
  • Support - you think this proposal should be added with zero or minor changes
  • Do not oppose - you think it's boring/meh/not for you, but it wouldn't harm to have it created
  • Oppose - you have a specific reason as to why this ribbon should not exist (state this reasoning in your comment)
  • Needs work - you think the achievement should be created after more significant changes have been made

See Proposed achievements for more information on this process.

For a while, I have been thinking that this achievement is missing and should be added. I'm not the first one to think about it though. Jevanyn is tracking the progress on which Counties of New Jersey he has reached, and OtherJack awarded himself the 5 Boro Achievement (via a Gratuitous ribbon) for visiting Geohashes in all 5 boroughs of New York. There may be more Geohashers who are tracking their process too that I forgot to mention here. I have been tracking my own progress too.

What do you think? Is this a worthy achievement? --Fippe (talk) 11:10, 1 September 2020 (UTC)

Another example that comes to mind is Michael5000's map of counties in Oregon and Washington. I actually considered a similar idea for the twelve Administrative Okrugs of Moscow, though never formulated it on my (rudimentary) user page. --January First-of-May (talk) 12:35, 1 September 2020 (UTC)
Support! So for me it would be 50 states in my nation (or 48 contiguous), 33 counties in my state, 33 census-designated places in my county (wikipedia:Santa_Fe_County,_New_Mexico#Communities)... Arlo (talk) 15:28, 1 September 2020 (UTC)