Difference between revisions of "Talk:Fibonacci achievement"
PeterRoder (talk | contribs) m (Fixed formatting) |
(rejected) |
||
| (5 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | '''Oppose'''. We already have [[Two to the N achievement|Two to the N]], and I don't see the point of having two different ways of counting the same thing. If it was counting something different, I might support. | + | '''Oppose'''. We already have [[Two to the N achievement|Two to the N]], and I don't see the point of having two different ways of counting the same thing. If it was counting something different, I might support. --[[User:PeterRoder|PeterRoder]] ([[User talk:PeterRoder|talk]]) 22:39, 14 January 2022 (UTC) |
| + | |||
| + | '''Oppose'''. Would not oppose it if it was combined with the Two to the N achievement to make a general counting achievement, but this may be controversial amongst people who enjoy that achievement as it is. This suggestion alone does not have enough uniqueness for an achievement. --[[User:KerrMcF|KerrMcF]] ([[User talk:KerrMcF|talk]]) 02:11, 27 February 2024 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | '''Oppose''' as a standalone achievement per PeterRoder, do not oppose as addition to the Two to the N achievement. --[[User:Fippe|Fippe]] ([[User talk:Fippe|talk]]) 02:55, 16 May 2024 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | '''Oppose''' Seems a bit over the top to have Fibonacci as well as 2^N. Tying them together in the same achievement does not make sense to me. [[User:Stevage|Stevage]] ([[User talk:Stevage|talk]]) 02:21, 5 July 2024 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | This proposal has been rejected, there has been no support and overwhelming opposition. Whether we add it to the 2^N achievement can be discussed at [[Talk:Two to the N achievement#Possible Addition to Two to the N]]. --[[User:Fippe|Fippe]] ([[User talk:Fippe|talk]]) 21:18, 13 July 2024 (UTC) | ||
Latest revision as of 21:19, 13 July 2024
Oppose. We already have Two to the N, and I don't see the point of having two different ways of counting the same thing. If it was counting something different, I might support. --PeterRoder (talk) 22:39, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
Oppose. Would not oppose it if it was combined with the Two to the N achievement to make a general counting achievement, but this may be controversial amongst people who enjoy that achievement as it is. This suggestion alone does not have enough uniqueness for an achievement. --KerrMcF (talk) 02:11, 27 February 2024 (UTC)
Oppose as a standalone achievement per PeterRoder, do not oppose as addition to the Two to the N achievement. --Fippe (talk) 02:55, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
Oppose Seems a bit over the top to have Fibonacci as well as 2^N. Tying them together in the same achievement does not make sense to me. Stevage (talk) 02:21, 5 July 2024 (UTC)
This proposal has been rejected, there has been no support and overwhelming opposition. Whether we add it to the 2^N achievement can be discussed at Talk:Two to the N achievement#Possible Addition to Two to the N. --Fippe (talk) 21:18, 13 July 2024 (UTC)
