Difference between revisions of "Talk:Cross that bridge achievement"

From Geohashing
imported>UnwiseOwl
m (Bridging)
imported>Relet
 
(2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 8: Line 8:
  
 
I've been trying to get it...it's only a matter of time...would I jetty count? -- [[User:UnwiseOwl|UnwiseOwl]] 10:36, 10 February 2009 (UTC)
 
I've been trying to get it...it's only a matter of time...would I jetty count? -- [[User:UnwiseOwl|UnwiseOwl]] 10:36, 10 February 2009 (UTC)
 +
 +
I thought it was kind of ridiulous. But okay, if it has support. No, a jetty definitely doesn't ount. Will edit aordingly. -[[User:Robyn|Robyn]] 16:45, 10 February 2009 (UTC)
 +
 +
I really like the idea of this one (even if it will be quite rare - but isn't that half the point?). Perhaps this is just the architect side of me speaking. --[[User:CJ|CJ]] 02:41, 14 February 2009 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 10:27, 5 April 2009

Bridges are vehicles now? -- UnwiseOwl 01:25, 18 December 2008 (UTC)

Wait, jumping off a bridge is an ordinary Water Geohash? Isn't it at least briefly an Air Geohash as well? -- Jevanyn 16:08, 18 December 2008 (UTC)

Vehicles for extended jokes, anyway. If you get a photo of the GPS on coordinates while you are airborne jumping off a bridge, there might be a ribbon for you, but I'm not sure it would be Air Geohash. Relet! It's all your fault! - Robyn

You tagged the page for deletion and claim it was only a joke? Actually, IMHO this was one of the better achievement ideas we have seen within of the past few months. It's a rather difficult Lucky Location, but it fits into the scheme of the basic ones. I would definitely try to take it some time. Unlike most of the other ideas I see floating around. --Ekorren 10:33, 10 February 2009 (UTC)

I've been trying to get it...it's only a matter of time...would I jetty count? -- UnwiseOwl 10:36, 10 February 2009 (UTC)

I thought it was kind of ridiulous. But okay, if it has support. No, a jetty definitely doesn't ount. Will edit aordingly. -Robyn 16:45, 10 February 2009 (UTC)

I really like the idea of this one (even if it will be quite rare - but isn't that half the point?). Perhaps this is just the architect side of me speaking. --CJ 02:41, 14 February 2009 (UTC)