Difference between revisions of "User talk:Benjaminb37"
imported>Relet (Re: Land usage) |
imported>Relet (→Welcome back!: new section) |
||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
I'm glad to see that my idea sparked children. :) Very nice work. Did you find an easy way to assemble these large size graticule maps? (I mean, leeching google maps would work to get ''a'' map, but how do you manage to confine to the graticule borders?) | I'm glad to see that my idea sparked children. :) Very nice work. Did you find an easy way to assemble these large size graticule maps? (I mean, leeching google maps would work to get ''a'' map, but how do you manage to confine to the graticule borders?) | ||
I unfortunately cannot test it - a FP version would be nice for that. But it seems to do the job quite nicely. :) Does it yield similar numbers for the graticules that have already been analyzed? (e.g. [[Berlin, Germany]] or [[Seattle, Washington]]) I would assume that your version with the larger maps yields a much better precision (and lower percentages for roads and highways, as they are not as bloated on the larger maps). -- [[User:relet|relet]] 12:08, 25 January 2009 (UTC) | I unfortunately cannot test it - a FP version would be nice for that. But it seems to do the job quite nicely. :) Does it yield similar numbers for the graticules that have already been analyzed? (e.g. [[Berlin, Germany]] or [[Seattle, Washington]]) I would assume that your version with the larger maps yields a much better precision (and lower percentages for roads and highways, as they are not as bloated on the larger maps). -- [[User:relet|relet]] 12:08, 25 January 2009 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | == Welcome back! == | ||
| + | |||
| + | And we're still waiting for pictures from your last two hashes. ;) -- [[User:relet|relet]] 07:39, 29 May 2010 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 07:39, 29 May 2010
Re: Land usage
Salut ben!
I'm glad to see that my idea sparked children. :) Very nice work. Did you find an easy way to assemble these large size graticule maps? (I mean, leeching google maps would work to get a map, but how do you manage to confine to the graticule borders?) I unfortunately cannot test it - a FP version would be nice for that. But it seems to do the job quite nicely. :) Does it yield similar numbers for the graticules that have already been analyzed? (e.g. Berlin, Germany or Seattle, Washington) I would assume that your version with the larger maps yields a much better precision (and lower percentages for roads and highways, as they are not as bloated on the larger maps). -- relet 12:08, 25 January 2009 (UTC)
Welcome back!
And we're still waiting for pictures from your last two hashes. ;) -- relet 07:39, 29 May 2010 (UTC)
