Difference between revisions of "Talk:2009-02-08 42 -85"
From Geohashing
imported>Robyn (No, you weren't the first.) |
imported>Excellentdude (Virgin talk page) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
I would say, no, not eligible for Virgin. Perhaps no one is, seeing as your predeessor can't produce the Q-tip, but there doesn't seem to be a doubt that he made it first. If a Virgin award had to be given for every graticule, I'd give it to him before you. -[[User:Robyn|Robyn]] 04:14, 27 February 2009 (UTC) | I would say, no, not eligible for Virgin. Perhaps no one is, seeing as your predeessor can't produce the Q-tip, but there doesn't seem to be a doubt that he made it first. If a Virgin award had to be given for every graticule, I'd give it to him before you. -[[User:Robyn|Robyn]] 04:14, 27 February 2009 (UTC) | ||
| + | :Hmm, I wasn't sure, but I was going off [[User:Thomcat|Thomcat's]] [[Talk:Virgin_Graticule|better proof principle]], illustrated [[Bellingham, Washington|here]]. I figured they offered no proof and I did, and someone ought to claim it at some point. :-) --[[User:Excellentdude|excellentdude]] 04:33, 27 February 2009 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 04:33, 27 February 2009
I would say, no, not eligible for Virgin. Perhaps no one is, seeing as your predeessor can't produce the Q-tip, but there doesn't seem to be a doubt that he made it first. If a Virgin award had to be given for every graticule, I'd give it to him before you. -Robyn 04:14, 27 February 2009 (UTC)
- Hmm, I wasn't sure, but I was going off Thomcat's better proof principle, illustrated here. I figured they offered no proof and I did, and someone ought to claim it at some point. :-) --excellentdude 04:33, 27 February 2009 (UTC)
