Difference between revisions of "Talk:Lloydminster West, Alberta"

From Geohashing
imported>Joannac
(suggestion)
imported>Robyn
(One of each, like Joanac suggested.)
Line 4: Line 4:
 
::Yeah, I had some trouble trying to decide what I should name this one. It feels so lonely being simply Lloydminster, and being Albertan, I'm tempted to stick it in Alberta, but I have the feeling that would cause an uproar. If anyone decides that it should be otherwise, I would be happy to change it. [[User:Meghan|Meghan]] 04:10, 6 March 2009 (UTC)
 
::Yeah, I had some trouble trying to decide what I should name this one. It feels so lonely being simply Lloydminster, and being Albertan, I'm tempted to stick it in Alberta, but I have the feeling that would cause an uproar. If anyone decides that it should be otherwise, I would be happy to change it. [[User:Meghan|Meghan]] 04:10, 6 March 2009 (UTC)
 
:::Why don't you call the west grat Lloydminster, Alberta, and the right one Lloydminster, Saskatchewan (and that is such a tricky word to spell!). --[[User:Joannac|joannac]] 04:18, 6 March 2009 (UTC)
 
:::Why don't you call the west grat Lloydminster, Alberta, and the right one Lloydminster, Saskatchewan (and that is such a tricky word to spell!). --[[User:Joannac|joannac]] 04:18, 6 March 2009 (UTC)
 +
::I've thought about this kind of thing in general. There is a precedent with a similar graticule [[Quad Cities, USA]]. When I saw that one, I sorely wanted to take the state that had the most area in the graticule and just make it "in" that state, but it wasn't my graticule and I resisted the temptation. In my opinion, "pick one" is the best strategy (go by the province with the most area or population in the graticule); and "Lloydminster, Canada" is better than "Lloydminster, Alberta and Saskatchewan". I can't see an uproar breaking out over Lloydminster, personally.  It's not like you're naming graticules on the West Bank.  And then include a redirect from the province you didn't pick, so that people can link to it by their choice. -[[User:Robyn|Robyn]] 04:26, 6 March 2009 (UTC)
 +
:::And I wrote that during an edit conflict, and before actually looking at the graticule. Joanna's suggestion is perfect. I left what I wrote above only as documentation of my thoughts on the general case. -[[User:Robyn|Robyn]] 04:26, 6 March 2009 (UTC)

Revision as of 04:26, 6 March 2009

Graticule name

Shouldn't this be named Lloydminster, Province? --joannac 00:43, 6 March 2009 (UTC)

It's one city in two provinces. "Lloydminster, Alberta and Saskatchewan" seems a bit unwieldy (but accurate). How about "Lloydminster, Canada"? --starbird 01:45, 6 March 2009 (UTC)
Yeah, I had some trouble trying to decide what I should name this one. It feels so lonely being simply Lloydminster, and being Albertan, I'm tempted to stick it in Alberta, but I have the feeling that would cause an uproar. If anyone decides that it should be otherwise, I would be happy to change it. Meghan 04:10, 6 March 2009 (UTC)
Why don't you call the west grat Lloydminster, Alberta, and the right one Lloydminster, Saskatchewan (and that is such a tricky word to spell!). --joannac 04:18, 6 March 2009 (UTC)
I've thought about this kind of thing in general. There is a precedent with a similar graticule Quad Cities, USA. When I saw that one, I sorely wanted to take the state that had the most area in the graticule and just make it "in" that state, but it wasn't my graticule and I resisted the temptation. In my opinion, "pick one" is the best strategy (go by the province with the most area or population in the graticule); and "Lloydminster, Canada" is better than "Lloydminster, Alberta and Saskatchewan". I can't see an uproar breaking out over Lloydminster, personally. It's not like you're naming graticules on the West Bank. And then include a redirect from the province you didn't pick, so that people can link to it by their choice. -Robyn 04:26, 6 March 2009 (UTC)
And I wrote that during an edit conflict, and before actually looking at the graticule. Joanna's suggestion is perfect. I left what I wrote above only as documentation of my thoughts on the general case. -Robyn 04:26, 6 March 2009 (UTC)