Difference between revisions of "2009-05-22 40 -4"

From Geohashing
imported>Relet
(Plans)
imported>Relet
(Plans)
Line 16: Line 16:
  
 
Who doesn't like [http://relet.net/g2/d/15364-2/P1030831.JPG plans?]
 
Who doesn't like [http://relet.net/g2/d/15364-2/P1030831.JPG plans?]
 +
 +
*Realized yesterday that my meeting would end in the early afternoon
 +
*Rented a car for the weekend
 +
*Asked the [http://tjum.anthill.de/geohash.html maitre d'] which hash would be recommended for people without a GPS device.
 +
*Then decided that since yesterdays hash had been too easy, there would have to be a challenge
 +
*[[Segovia, Spain]] not only had an interesting terrain profile (I like mountains), but also the hash in a deserted (I meant ''devoid of structures'' at that time) forest, where I would have to identify the correct lump of trees based on the satellite images.
 +
*Hence the plan. I indicated all the sandy tracks I could make out, and any other landmark. Landmarks would be mostly significant bends in these tracks. In the close range, landmarks were large trees, casting a significant amount of shadow on the tracks.
 +
*Failsafe, eh?
  
 
== Expedition ==
 
== Expedition ==

Revision as of 19:52, 22 May 2009

A highway through the desert
Fri 22 May 2009 in 40,-4:
40.4905859, -4.3600474
geohashing.info google osm bing/os kml crox


Participants

Plans

Who doesn't like plans?

  • Realized yesterday that my meeting would end in the early afternoon
  • Rented a car for the weekend
  • Asked the maitre d' which hash would be recommended for people without a GPS device.
  • Then decided that since yesterdays hash had been too easy, there would have to be a challenge
  • Segovia, Spain not only had an interesting terrain profile (I like mountains), but also the hash in a deserted (I meant devoid of structures at that time) forest, where I would have to identify the correct lump of trees based on the satellite images.
  • Hence the plan. I indicated all the sandy tracks I could make out, and any other landmark. Landmarks would be mostly significant bends in these tracks. In the close range, landmarks were large trees, casting a significant amount of shadow on the tracks.
  • Failsafe, eh?

Expedition

Tracklog *with* Photos

(but it's not a real tracklog)
http://www.everytrail.com/view_trip.php?trip_id=216084