Difference between revisions of "Talk:2009-06-24 43 -79"
From Geohashing
imported>Juventas (good stuff) |
imported>Splitdipless |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
''1/100th of a sucess!'' Good sportsmanship. :) [[User:Juventas|Juventas]] 02:58, 25 June 2009 (UTC) | ''1/100th of a sucess!'' Good sportsmanship. :) [[User:Juventas|Juventas]] 02:58, 25 June 2009 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | :[[User:Joannac|joannac]] corrected the category for me. It inspired me to go back and check my other expiditions. I had one listed as both a sucess and failure at the same time. Ex logged seperately from hashes on user page too. [[User:Splitdipless|Splitdipless]] 03:35, 30 June 2009 (UTC) | ||
Latest revision as of 03:35, 30 June 2009
I think It's a fine expedition. I agree it's not a ribbon sort of thing, but I disagree that "a real geohashers wouldn't consider it an expedition. You went on and documented a geohashing inspired expedition. You correctly marked it not reached. You win. -Robyn 02:03, 25 June 2009 (UTC)
- Actually, I marked it not reached. The geohasher initially marked it as reached. I agree it's a worthwhile expedition, in the same vein than going to an alternate is a worthwhile expedition. --joannac 02:18, 25 June 2009 (UTC)
1/100th of a sucess! Good sportsmanship. :) Juventas 02:58, 25 June 2009 (UTC)
- joannac corrected the category for me. It inspired me to go back and check my other expiditions. I had one listed as both a sucess and failure at the same time. Ex logged seperately from hashes on user page too. Splitdipless 03:35, 30 June 2009 (UTC)
