Difference between revisions of "Talk:Stacking achievement"

From Geohashing
imported>Koepfel
(support)
imported>Jiml
(DNO)
Line 1: Line 1:
 
{{Proposal talk|date=2009-10-17}}
 
{{Proposal talk|date=2009-10-17}}
  
'''support'''. I like the idea. Might need to clarify what is the minimum altitude difference between two "levels", and whether you are allowed to bring (ladders/bridges/buildings) to gain the achievement -- [[User:relet|relet]] 17:15, 17 October 2009 (UTC)
+
* '''support'''. I like the idea. Might need to clarify what is the minimum altitude difference between two "levels", and whether you are allowed to bring (ladders/bridges/buildings) to gain the achievement -- [[User:relet|relet]] 17:15, 17 October 2009 (UTC)
 
: Clarified the wording as requested. --[[User:Davidc|davidc]] 17:43, 17 October 2009 (UTC)
 
: Clarified the wording as requested. --[[User:Davidc|davidc]] 17:43, 17 October 2009 (UTC)
:'''support'''. ilpadre, Fluxkompensator, Mo6eB, his friends and me already did this on today's expedition. Current rules are acceptable, imho. {{User:Koepfel/signature}} 18:08, 14 November 2009 (UTC)
+
*'''support'''. ilpadre, Fluxkompensator, Mo6eB, his friends and me already did this on today's expedition. Current rules are acceptable, imho. {{User:Koepfel/signature}} 18:08, 14 November 2009 (UTC)
 +
*'''Do not oppose'''.  Seems like a reasonable achievement definition, but it doesn't seem like it will get achieved very often at all.  We can try it and see what happens.  [[User:Jiml|Jiml]] 02:03, 15 November 2009 (UTC)

Revision as of 02:03, 15 November 2009

This is a proposal made on 2009-10-17. Please leave comments and suggestions below, indicating your thoughts on the proposal, including:
  • Support - you think this proposal should be added with zero or minor changes
  • Do not oppose - you think it's boring/meh/not for you, but it wouldn't harm to have it created
  • Oppose - you have a specific reason as to why this ribbon should not exist (state this reasoning in your comment)
  • Needs work - you think the achievement should be created after more significant changes have been made

See Proposed achievements for more information on this process.

  • support. I like the idea. Might need to clarify what is the minimum altitude difference between two "levels", and whether you are allowed to bring (ladders/bridges/buildings) to gain the achievement -- relet 17:15, 17 October 2009 (UTC)
Clarified the wording as requested. --davidc 17:43, 17 October 2009 (UTC)
  • support. ilpadre, Fluxkompensator, Mo6eB, his friends and me already did this on today's expedition. Current rules are acceptable, imho. Koepfel talk 18:08, 14 November 2009 (UTC)
  • Do not oppose. Seems like a reasonable achievement definition, but it doesn't seem like it will get achieved very often at all. We can try it and see what happens. Jiml 02:03, 15 November 2009 (UTC)