Difference between revisions of "2022-01-16 40 -4"

From Geohashing
(Created page with "<!-- [[Image:{{{image|IMAGE}}}|thumb|left]] --> <!-- Remove this section if you don't want an image at the top (left) of your report. You should remove the "Image...")
 
m (Expedition)
Line 44: Line 44:
 
Could I have told from the Maps that the geohash was not
 
Could I have told from the Maps that the geohash was not
 
accessible? I checked afterwards, and the answer is
 
accessible? I checked afterwards, and the answer is
probably not. Walls are visible in the satellite view,
+
“probably not.Walls are visible in the satellite view,
 
but you can't tell how substantial they are and whether
 
but you can't tell how substantial they are and whether
 
any gates are seriously locked or not. By the way, I saw on
 
any gates are seriously locked or not. By the way, I saw on

Revision as of 07:23, 18 January 2022


Sun 16 Jan 2022 in 40,-4:
40.4869508, -4.1532926
geohashing.info google osm bing/os kml crox


Location

30 meters behind a locked gate, on a sheep paddock, close to a bunker system, near Fresnedillas de la Oliva.

Participants

Wingman (talk)

Plans

Expedition

This was the second expedition after 2022-01-10_40_-4 that I did as a mystery tour without checking out the geohash on the Maps beforehand. It was very close, only eleven kilometers to ride, as the navigation device told me.

At the exit where the navigation device wanted to leave the paved road, I could conveniently park the Goldwing. From there, I continued on foot. It was quite an interesting walk, although I could not reach the geohash in the end.

Could I have told from the Maps that the geohash was not accessible? I checked afterwards, and the answer is “probably not.” Walls are visible in the satellite view, but you can't tell how substantial they are and whether any gates are seriously locked or not. By the way, I saw on the Maps that the geohash was not inside the little round building, but a few meters away.

Tracklog

Photos

Achievements