Difference between revisions of "Talk:2008-06-05 64 -149"
From Geohashing
imported>Benjw |
imported>Thomcat (Mea culpa) |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
:Nope. -- [[User:relet|relet]] 10:08, 2 March 2009 (UTC) | :Nope. -- [[User:relet|relet]] 10:08, 2 March 2009 (UTC) | ||
::Having now read the report properly, I see that he '''did''' reach the hashpoint. I was distracted by the Failure category at the bottom of the page, which I now see was added by Thomcat, not the report's author. -- [[User:Benjw|Benjw]] 14:27, 2 March 2009 (UTC) | ::Having now read the report properly, I see that he '''did''' reach the hashpoint. I was distracted by the Failure category at the bottom of the page, which I now see was added by Thomcat, not the report's author. -- [[User:Benjw|Benjw]] 14:27, 2 March 2009 (UTC) | ||
| + | :::A mistake! These are a rare and highly collectible commodity ;) --[[User:Thomcat|Thomcat]] 14:47, 2 March 2009 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 14:47, 2 March 2009
Can someone really say they earned the North Geohash achievement when they didn't reach the hashpoint? -- Benjw 06:20, 2 March 2009 (UTC)
- Nope. -- relet 10:08, 2 March 2009 (UTC)
- Having now read the report properly, I see that he did reach the hashpoint. I was distracted by the Failure category at the bottom of the page, which I now see was added by Thomcat, not the report's author. -- Benjw 14:27, 2 March 2009 (UTC)
- A mistake! These are a rare and highly collectible commodity ;) --Thomcat 14:47, 2 March 2009 (UTC)
- Having now read the report properly, I see that he did reach the hashpoint. I was distracted by the Failure category at the bottom of the page, which I now see was added by Thomcat, not the report's author. -- Benjw 14:27, 2 March 2009 (UTC)
