Difference between revisions of "Category talk:Not reached - Technology"
imported>Robyn (Radioactive wasteland: not reached - technology?) |
imported>Relet |
||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
And no, thanks for asking, I ''don't'' have anything better to do today. -[[User:Robyn|Robyn]] 21:16, 31 March 2009 (UTC) | And no, thanks for asking, I ''don't'' have anything better to do today. -[[User:Robyn|Robyn]] 21:16, 31 March 2009 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | :Not reached - Chickened out? :D -- [[User:relet|relet]] 21:18, 31 March 2009 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 21:18, 31 March 2009
Philosophical question: If the coordinates lie in an area that has not been declared off limits to the public but which contains live mines, is covered in acres of shredded rusty metal, is contaminated by toxic waste or otherwise is rendered unsuitable for geohashing by manmade items, and despite the fact that you would be allowed to go there, you decided to turn back, how do you class it?
Not reached - No public access isn't appropriate, because we're postulating a situation where hazards have been abandoned on public land.
Not reached - Mother Nature doesn't work, unless we consider that Mother Nature has failed to assimilate the carnage, and failed to provide you with invulnerability.
I'm thinking Not reached - Technology is the best, even though it is not your own technology that has betrayed you, it is a technological problem.
And no, thanks for asking, I don't have anything better to do today. -Robyn 21:16, 31 March 2009 (UTC)
- Not reached - Chickened out? :D -- relet 21:18, 31 March 2009 (UTC)
