Difference between revisions of "Talk:2009-06-21 51 -0"
imported>Norsemark (→Claim: new section) |
imported>Relet (→Claim) |
||
| Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
Any thoughts? | Any thoughts? | ||
| + | |||
| + | :As long as you have no doubt that you reached the point, or that it was perfectly reachable without further effort, that's perfectly fine. We're not doing hard science here. Only if you know there was that unsurmountable wall or fence or ditch or field of nettles between you and the hash, then you shouldn't claim it. -- [[User:relet|relet]] 12:26, 22 June 2009 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 12:26, 22 June 2009
Woah! Just realised how close this is to the meridian. Multihash opportunity?! The two points are only a few miles (and the River Thames) apart. This could be insanely good -- Norsemark 22:45, 19 June 2009 (UTC)
Post-hash initial thoughts
Before I post the report, I'm just going to say that I'm not going to post up any achievements as I'm not convinced they were earned, sadly, but there's a story attached, nonetheless...
Gimme some time to pull it together - once it's all there you'll understand why!
Claim
Unless there are any objections, I am going to claim this as a successful attempt.
In spite of technological failure I reached the point to 3 decimal places (which is as detailed at the G1 Application enables) and traced the route along the street wall. The GPS tracker doesn't nail it down to feet and inches and hence shows the dancing route you see here.
Have no problems in calling it a "Blinded By Science" failure if this is insufficient proof, but I'm not sure what else I could do to prove this one.
Any thoughts?
- As long as you have no doubt that you reached the point, or that it was perfectly reachable without further effort, that's perfectly fine. We're not doing hard science here. Only if you know there was that unsurmountable wall or fence or ditch or field of nettles between you and the hash, then you shouldn't claim it. -- relet 12:26, 22 June 2009 (UTC)
