Difference between revisions of "Talk:2009-10-10 52 13"
imported>Sermoa m (→awesome!: london underground geohash possibilities) |
imported>Davidc |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | {{ | + | {{Advert}} |
:Hey! I've seen the marker! Ha! And I doubt anyone else has! -- [[User:relet|relet]] 22:58, 10 October 2009 (UTC) | :Hey! I've seen the marker! Ha! And I doubt anyone else has! -- [[User:relet|relet]] 22:58, 10 October 2009 (UTC) | ||
Latest revision as of 23:23, 17 October 2009
| Have you seen our geohashing marker?
If you came here because you saw a sign, we'd love it if you would say "hi" and tell us what you've seen. Just click the + (plus) tab above. |
- Hey! I've seen the marker! Ha! And I doubt anyone else has! -- relet 22:58, 10 October 2009 (UTC)
- That would be highly unlikely, yes ^^ :D --HiroProtagonist 17:08, 11 October 2009 (UTC)
awesome!
i so like this report - it appeals to many things that i love: geohashing, public transport, and berlin! your proof is wonderful: i like the care you took to ensure that you definitely went through the geohash point! now i'm curious about the marker you left - where did you leave it, and would anyone else be able to see it? -- sermoa 21:54, 11 October 2009 (UTC)
- Well, davidc prepared the file, I helped to translate it, lyx printed it, and we jointly forgot to attach it anywhere. The short answer is 'no'. -- relet 22:17, 11 October 2009 (UTC)
I'd like to chime in under "awesome" too! Excellent hash with many points of interest. Congratulations on the Going Deep achievement - I'm not sure that would be possible in London, where the Tube generally snakes around all over the place. :) --macronencer 01:38, 12 October 2009 (UTC)
- Not always. the district and circle lines are the old cut and cover method, so they run exactly under the roads. I think parts of the central line too. we'll get one. someday! :) -- sermoa 06:33, 12 October 2009 (UTC)
