Difference between revisions of "Talk:Foreign achievement"
From Geohashing
imported>Mampfred m |
imported>Pedalpusher |
||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
* '''Oppose''' because it's almost 100% a subset of an existing achievement --[[User:Ekorren|Ekorren]] 07:51, 5 June 2012 (EDT) | * '''Oppose''' because it's almost 100% a subset of an existing achievement --[[User:Ekorren|Ekorren]] 07:51, 5 June 2012 (EDT) | ||
* '''Oppose''' as I agree with Ekorrens explanation. Your expedition qualifies as a [[Border geohash]], right? - [[User:Mampfred|Mampfred]] 08:01, 5 June 2012 (EDT) | * '''Oppose''' as I agree with Ekorrens explanation. Your expedition qualifies as a [[Border geohash]], right? - [[User:Mampfred|Mampfred]] 08:01, 5 June 2012 (EDT) | ||
| + | * '''Oppose''' as I also agree it's basically a Border hash. With the time open and all votes as Opposed, moved to Rejected. [[User:Pedalpusher|Pedalpusher]] ([[User talk:Pedalpusher|talk]]) 15:28, 17 October 2014 (EDT) | ||
Latest revision as of 19:28, 17 October 2014
Discussion
There's the Border geohash achievement, there's the Globetrotter achievement, there are the Regional achievements, and collecting graticules is most accepted as an interesting goal in geohashing. I don't think something that's basically nothing else than a weakened version of the Border geohash is worth a new achievement. If at all, it would be worth a honorable mention for the Border geohash. If you want a ribbon for your embassy geohash, which is perfectly understandable, just go ahead and create a gratuitious ribbon. --Ekorren 07:51, 5 June 2012 (EDT)
Voting
- Oppose because it's almost 100% a subset of an existing achievement --Ekorren 07:51, 5 June 2012 (EDT)
- Oppose as I agree with Ekorrens explanation. Your expedition qualifies as a Border geohash, right? - Mampfred 08:01, 5 June 2012 (EDT)
- Oppose as I also agree it's basically a Border hash. With the time open and all votes as Opposed, moved to Rejected. Pedalpusher (talk) 15:28, 17 October 2014 (EDT)
