Difference between revisions of "Talk:Two to the N achievement"
From Geohashing
imported>Danatar (support) |
imported>Jiml (Add vote in favor) |
||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
'''approve''' I really like it (almost level 6, yay)! But what about planned, but not (really) attempted expeditions? Counting: Actual expeditions? -- [[User:RecentlyChanged|RecentlyChanged]] ([[User_talk:RecentlyChanged|talk]]) 12:16, 27 May 2015 (EDT) | '''approve''' I really like it (almost level 6, yay)! But what about planned, but not (really) attempted expeditions? Counting: Actual expeditions? -- [[User:RecentlyChanged|RecentlyChanged]] ([[User_talk:RecentlyChanged|talk]]) 12:16, 27 May 2015 (EDT) | ||
| − | *I've read the description again, you already thought about the | + | *I've read the description again, you already thought about the expedition planning/actual expedition/reached thing. I would like counting the actual expeditions more, but I see the point in counting reached ones too. Can we distinguish them somehow? --- [[User:RecentlyChanged|RecentlyChanged]] ([[User_talk:RecentlyChanged|talk]]) |
::I think we should stick to the system already in use on pages like [[Most active graticules]]. I check out every potential expedition and recording these would get silly. Once I step out of my home, that's an expedition which can be counted. And it's a bonus if the coordinates are reached, counted separately. We'll need a global version of the ribbon too. --[[User:Sourcerer|Sourcerer]] ([[User talk:Sourcerer|talk]]) 03:49, 28 May 2015 (EDT) | ::I think we should stick to the system already in use on pages like [[Most active graticules]]. I check out every potential expedition and recording these would get silly. Once I step out of my home, that's an expedition which can be counted. And it's a bonus if the coordinates are reached, counted separately. We'll need a global version of the ribbon too. --[[User:Sourcerer|Sourcerer]] ([[User talk:Sourcerer|talk]]) 03:49, 28 May 2015 (EDT) | ||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
I '''support''' this achievement, and also the distinction expeditions vs reached. - [[User:Danatar|Danatar]]<sup>7</sup> 08:52, 30 May 2015 (EDT) | I '''support''' this achievement, and also the distinction expeditions vs reached. - [[User:Danatar|Danatar]]<sup>7</sup> 08:52, 30 May 2015 (EDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | I '''approve''' of this achievement, even though I'm afraid it will be a while before I get the next | ||
| + | level of either version of it. [[User:Jiml|Jiml]] ([[User talk:Jiml|talk]]) | ||
Revision as of 15:24, 7 June 2015
+1 -- Jevanyn (talk) 13:50, 26 May 2015 (EDT)
Not too shabby; could be a fun way to celebrate 256 - approve --Thomcat (talk) 08:46, 27 May 2015 (EDT)
approve I really like it (almost level 6, yay)! But what about planned, but not (really) attempted expeditions? Counting: Actual expeditions? -- RecentlyChanged (talk) 12:16, 27 May 2015 (EDT)
- I've read the description again, you already thought about the expedition planning/actual expedition/reached thing. I would like counting the actual expeditions more, but I see the point in counting reached ones too. Can we distinguish them somehow? --- RecentlyChanged (talk)
- I think we should stick to the system already in use on pages like Most active graticules. I check out every potential expedition and recording these would get silly. Once I step out of my home, that's an expedition which can be counted. And it's a bonus if the coordinates are reached, counted separately. We'll need a global version of the ribbon too. --Sourcerer (talk) 03:49, 28 May 2015 (EDT)
I support being able to "level up" in real life like you would in a video game! Mystrsyko (talk) 11:23, 28 May 2015 (EDT)
I support this achievement, and also the distinction expeditions vs reached. - Danatar7 08:52, 30 May 2015 (EDT)
I approve of this achievement, even though I'm afraid it will be a while before I get the next level of either version of it. Jiml (talk)
