Difference between revisions of "Talk:Most active graticules/old"
From Geohashing
imported>Woodveil |
imported>Thomcat (Thanks Benjw !!) |
||
Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
=== Editor's Note === | === Editor's Note === | ||
− | 2009 | + | The totals for January 2009 are in, and my local charts are updated with the results of [[User:Benjw|Benjw]] hunting for expeditions - thanks! Our big monthly winner is [[Atlanta, Georgia]] in each category (you guys know that it's okay to document unsuccessful expeditions, right?). Runners up include [[Mannheim, Germany]], [[Pforzheim, Germany]], and my own [[Seattle, Washington]]. |
− | + | ||
+ | I changed the chart around also, so all of 2008 is in one column. We will continue to grow through 2009, then do chart compaction again in early 2010. | ||
+ | |||
+ | See you next month! | ||
+ | --[[User:Thomcat|Thomcat]] 17:58, 11 February 2009 (UTC) |
Revision as of 17:58, 11 February 2009
Discussion
Final 2008 statistics at 2008 Most active graticules and archived talk at Talk:2008 Most active graticules.
Editor's Note
The totals for January 2009 are in, and my local charts are updated with the results of Benjw hunting for expeditions - thanks! Our big monthly winner is Atlanta, Georgia in each category (you guys know that it's okay to document unsuccessful expeditions, right?). Runners up include Mannheim, Germany, Pforzheim, Germany, and my own Seattle, Washington.
I changed the chart around also, so all of 2008 is in one column. We will continue to grow through 2009, then do chart compaction again in early 2010.
See you next month! --Thomcat 17:58, 11 February 2009 (UTC)