Talk:Border geohash achievement
From Geohashing
Revision as of 09:01, 29 January 2013 by imported>Calamus (moved Talk:Border geohash to Talk:Border geohash achievement: Naming conventions#Achievements_and_ribbons)
How strong to interpret "express purpose" in this context?
I admit that I had forgotten about "express purpose" when I claimed that achievement, but now I wonder whether I should delete it again. I would have gone to Luxembourg even without the hashpoint being there, but that way I postponed other goals and went straight from the border the fastest way to the hashpoint. Would that still count?
- I would say you can keep it until the international goehashing rules committee has convened, and I bet before that happens you'll have another transborder geohash with no ulterior motives. You could just put a big asterisk next to it. :-) -Robyn 18:42, 31 October 2008 (UTC)