Category talk:National Parks
From Geohashing
Revision as of 17:57, 22 May 2009 by imported>Robyn (I want a P!)
This looks like it was moved due to page name capitalisation. Even if the page were kept, it would be moved to 'National parks' right? (and that could be a good idea actually) mykaDragonBlue [- i have no sig -] 01:38, 22 May 2009 (UTC)
- Yes, I like the idea of a National Parks category. National parks are great and I bet they make for great geohashes. The Robot change National Parks ->>Houston parks makes no sense. I'm not sure I agree with the capitalization though. One of these things is a National Park, not a National park, no? A "National park" sounds like a park run by a company called National, instead of a proper National Park.-Robyn 16:01, 22 May 2009 (UTC)
- Oh, wait! That was me? Sorry. It should read "National parks" of course. -- relet 17:31, 22 May 2009 (UTC)
- Why not National Parks? Am I the only one that reads a "national park" as not the same thing as a "National Park"? It's like a geohashing day versus Geohashing Day. -Robyn 17:57, 22 May 2009 (UTC)
