Difference between revisions of "2022-02-26 40 -3"
From Geohashing
(Created page with "<!-- [[Image:{{{image|IMAGE}}}|thumb|left]] --> <!-- Remove this section if you don't want an image at the top (left) of your report. You should remove the "Image...") |
m (Location) |
||
(2 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown) | |||
Line 44: | Line 44: | ||
As mostly expected, I could not reach it. | As mostly expected, I could not reach it. | ||
− | == Tracklog == | + | == Tracklog (only the walk) == |
<!-- if your GPS device keeps a log, you may post a link | <!-- if your GPS device keeps a log, you may post a link | ||
here --> | here --> | ||
Line 68: | Line 68: | ||
[[Category:Expeditions]] | [[Category:Expeditions]] | ||
− | + | ||
<!-- ==REQUEST FOR TWITTER BOT== Please leave either the New | <!-- ==REQUEST FOR TWITTER BOT== Please leave either the New | ||
report or the Expedition planning category in as long | report or the Expedition planning category in as long | ||
Line 85: | Line 85: | ||
target: --> | target: --> | ||
[[Category:Not reached - No public access]] | [[Category:Not reached - No public access]] | ||
+ | {{location|ES|MD}} |
Latest revision as of 16:42, 28 February 2022
Sat 26 Feb 2022 in 40,-3: 40.4534313, -3.8637963 geohashing.info google osm bing/os kml crox |
Location
In an apartment building in Majadahonda.
Participants
Plans
Expedition
This was one of the few occasion here in central Spain that the geohash fell in a populated area. Like in expedition 2021-07-17_40_-3, it was on private property, this time even inside an apartment building. It was quite close to an outer wall, so standing directly by the wall might have counted as a hit within GPS accuracy. However, such apartment buildings in better neighborhood are usually not publicly accessible and are well protected. Anyway, I had to do some shopping with the car which brought me to within a few kilometers of the geohash, so I decided to give it a try. As mostly expected, I could not reach it.
Tracklog (only the walk)