Difference between revisions of "2024-02-18 -35 138"

From Geohashing
m (minesweeper, i guess)
m (forgot these two edits)
Line 14: Line 14:
 
== Location ==
 
== Location ==
 
<!-- where you've surveyed the hash to be -->
 
<!-- where you've surveyed the hash to be -->
 +
A firetrack near Mount Barker
  
 
== Participants ==
 
== Participants ==
Line 62: Line 63:
 
<!-- =============== USEFUL CATEGORIES FOLLOW ================
 
<!-- =============== USEFUL CATEGORIES FOLLOW ================
 
Delete the next line ONLY if you have chosen the appropriate categories below. If you are unsure, don't worry. People will read your report and help you with the classification. -->
 
Delete the next line ONLY if you have chosen the appropriate categories below. If you are unsure, don't worry. People will read your report and help you with the classification. -->
[[Category:New report]]
 
  
 
<!-- ==REQUEST FOR TWITTER BOT== Please leave either the New report or the Expedition planning category in as long as you work on it. This helps the twitter bot a lot with announcing the right outcome at the right moment. -->
 
<!-- ==REQUEST FOR TWITTER BOT== Please leave either the New report or the Expedition planning category in as long as you work on it. This helps the twitter bot a lot with announcing the right outcome at the right moment. -->

Revision as of 01:18, 21 February 2024

Sun 18 Feb 2024 in -35,138:
-35.1123376, 138.8348436
geohashing.info google osm bing/os kml crox

Location

A firetrack near Mount Barker

Participants

XXOs (talk)

XXOs's dad

Plans

The reasoning for doing this geohash was basically the same as my last one - I still need more (night) hours for my driver's license, and again my father was available and the geohash was (probably) accessible.

Expedition

The drive to this hashpoint was slightly more eventful than last time! By which I mean there were roadworks on the South Eastern Freeway, and so I had to travel at 40km/h rather than the usual 80-100km/h.

After a little under an hour of driving, we reached the hashpoint. Well, almost. The point was about 200 metres down a fire track which we weren't allowed to drive down, so we had to walk the last stretch. It wasn't too bad, but my dad was wearing sandals (not the best walking shoes) and there was an annoying amount of bugs.

I almost didn't reach the hash, as it was very slightly on someone's property, but it was close enough to the fence that I could successfully claim it.

Photos

(I've figured out how to keep the photo metadata from my phone this time)

Achievements

TwoToN.png
by attempting to reach 23 hashpoints on 2024-02-18 -35 138 and is promoted to Level 3 (Expeditions).
Minesweeper geohash empty.png Minesweeper geohash empty.png Minesweeper geohash empty.png
Minesweeper geohash empty.png Minesweeper geohash 1.png Minesweeper geohash empty.png
Minesweeper geohash empty.png Minesweeper geohash flag.png Minesweeper geohash empty.png
XXOs achieved level 1 of the Minesweeper Geohash achievement
by visiting coordinates in Adelaide North, Australia and 1 of the surrounding graticules.
Minesweeper geohash empty.png Minesweeper geohash flag.png Minesweeper geohash empty.png
Minesweeper geohash empty.png Minesweeper geohash 1.png Minesweeper geohash empty.png
Minesweeper geohash empty.png Minesweeper geohash empty.png Minesweeper geohash empty.png
XXOs achieved level 1 of the Minesweeper Geohash achievement
by visiting coordinates in Adelaide South, Australia and 1 of the surrounding graticules.
Boatless.PNG
Is it true that this user earned the Regional geohashing achievement?
In principle, yes.
But the hash point is technically not in the city of Adelaide, and any definitions of "Greater Adelaide" either don't include it or include more than just -34,138 and -35,138 (2024-02-18 -35 138).