Difference between revisions of "Talk:Centicule"
From Geohashing
imported>Aperfectring (my 2 pence) |
imported>Aperfectring |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Shouldn't this be called a centicule? --[[User:Joannac|joannac]] 23:30, 24 June 2009 (UTC) | Shouldn't this be called a centicule? --[[User:Joannac|joannac]] 23:30, 24 June 2009 (UTC) | ||
:I'm of the opinion that, while the proposal should be kept for history's sake, we should make it clear that this has by and large been rejected by the geohashing community. If people want to use this algorithm to still go to a random point when the official point is inaccessible, that is fine, but said adventures are not geohashes, and don't count for achievements or coordinates reached. --[[User:Aperfectring|aperfectring]] 23:48, 24 June 2009 (UTC) | :I'm of the opinion that, while the proposal should be kept for history's sake, we should make it clear that this has by and large been rejected by the geohashing community. If people want to use this algorithm to still go to a random point when the official point is inaccessible, that is fine, but said adventures are not geohashes, and don't count for achievements or coordinates reached. --[[User:Aperfectring|aperfectring]] 23:48, 24 June 2009 (UTC) | ||
| + | :Also, the [[centicule]] nomenclature is also in use elsewhere. --[[User:Aperfectring|aperfectring]] 23:53, 24 June 2009 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 23:53, 24 June 2009
Shouldn't this be called a centicule? --joannac 23:30, 24 June 2009 (UTC)
- I'm of the opinion that, while the proposal should be kept for history's sake, we should make it clear that this has by and large been rejected by the geohashing community. If people want to use this algorithm to still go to a random point when the official point is inaccessible, that is fine, but said adventures are not geohashes, and don't count for achievements or coordinates reached. --aperfectring 23:48, 24 June 2009 (UTC)
- Also, the centicule nomenclature is also in use elsewhere. --aperfectring 23:53, 24 June 2009 (UTC)
