Talk:No Batteries Geohash

I propose a new extension of this: the "X-TREME!!!!! No Batteries Geohash": In addition to the basic No Batteries requirements, additional, you must calculate the coordinates by hand. Using something electronic to fetch the input data (Dow opening price) is permissible, though if you can get it through smoke signals or something, so much the better! After that,may paper, pencil, and the Force be with you! --Kyevan 05:12, 29 June 2008 (UTC)

Uh... doing MD5 by hand?! That sounds like a whole new category, to me. Wow. That makes my head hurt... 64.74.213.98 06:31, 29 June 2008 (UTC)

We had a discussion about this on the IRC channel. It was to be an extreme version of the endurance geohash. Rest assured if any person or team of people calculates the geohash by hand and reaches the coordinates on the same day, we'll make sure there's a ribbon for it. -Robyn 03:22, 12 September 2008 (UTC)

Clarification... Are you eligible for this achievement if you use no tools at all for the actual trip? Most city dwellers can easily locate the precise hash position on a map prior to leaving the house, then reach and stand directly on it without any further assistance.

No batteries + Digicam?

I wonder how some people here did fabricate their proof. -- Relet 07:32, 1 August 2008 (UTC)

Well I guess the batteries weren't needed for reaching the geohash, just documenting it -- Kriechstrom 15:17, 10 September 2008 (UTC)

...but one can never prove a negative, in this case, that one didn't have a GPS.... -- Jevanyn 20:04, 9 April 2009 (UTC)

Vehicle Batteries?

Is it ok to use a vehicle battery? Watch? Camera? Media player?

In other words, I think the requirements should be clarified. --193.254.155.48

The achievement was written with the idea of using only pre-GPS technology to locate the point, but I like the idea of expanding it to mean no batteries whatsover. I guess that allows you to use your computer plugged in to find the coordinates, and then use non-battery-using transportation and technology to get there. Perhaps it could have a second rank. -Robyn 17:14, 19 January 2009 (UTC)