Talk:2009-03-12 37 -122
From Geohashing
Is it absolutely necessary to use a 2.5MB image, rather than one a lot closer to the 250kB (or is it 150kB?) guideline that is suggested? -- Benjw 07:36, 13 March 2009 (UTC)
- Uploaded a 232k version (1/4 scale.) The warnings kick-in at 150k. I'll let FT play with the image further, if he wants to. Ted 15:24, 13 March 2009 (UTC)
- I was being lazy. Also I (mistakenly) thought that resizing within the wiki would help with the bandwidth issue. The image wasn't linked to the main page so I figured the impact would be minimal. I apologize for the inconvenience. FunkyTuba 18:30, 13 March 2009 (UTC)
- Sorry, FT -- I confused you with someone else, you studly hunk-a man, you! :) Ted 20:40, 13 March 2009 (UTC)
- ;-D FunkyTuba 22:32, 13 March 2009 (UTC)
