Difference between revisions of "Category talk:Tagged for deletion"
From Geohashing
imported>Relet |
imported>Ekorren (some comments) |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
== Notes regarding pages tagged for deletion == | == Notes regarding pages tagged for deletion == | ||
Just for one place to put all these. Please chip in with opinions. I will remove bullet points as they are resolved. | Just for one place to put all these. Please chip in with opinions. I will remove bullet points as they are resolved. | ||
+ | |||
*Can I delete [[Bill Gates achievement]] (and associated pages) along with [[Expensive_Geohash]] (and associated pages)? | *Can I delete [[Bill Gates achievement]] (and associated pages) along with [[Expensive_Geohash]] (and associated pages)? | ||
:support -- [[User:relet|relet]] 08:00, 21 May 2009 (UTC) | :support -- [[User:relet|relet]] 08:00, 21 May 2009 (UTC) | ||
:Against Bill Gates. It's humor. Expensive can go though. -- [[User:Wmcduff|Wmcduff]] 12:30, 21 May 2009 (UTC) | :Against Bill Gates. It's humor. Expensive can go though. -- [[User:Wmcduff|Wmcduff]] 12:30, 21 May 2009 (UTC) | ||
:I say keep expensive as a way of recording unusually expensive adventures [[User:MykaDragonBlue|mykaDragonBlue [- i have no sig -]]] 01:48, 22 May 2009 (UTC) | :I say keep expensive as a way of recording unusually expensive adventures [[User:MykaDragonBlue|mykaDragonBlue [- i have no sig -]]] 01:48, 22 May 2009 (UTC) | ||
+ | :Keep Bill Gates, because it makes for a good laugh (and well illustrates the impossibility of cheating the algorithm which is doubted by almost everyone once in a while). "Expensive" was supposed to be turned into a "subjective" achievement, a task that's more served by the gratutious ribbons nowadays. I don't like to think of this as a regular ''achievement'' but would like to keep the ''ribbon'' available. --[[User:Ekorren|Ekorren]] 08:54, 22 May 2009 (UTC) | ||
+ | |||
*[[:Category:Meet-up achievement]] still has a whole bunch of pages in it | *[[:Category:Meet-up achievement]] still has a whole bunch of pages in it | ||
:I will check if someone has renamed the achievement.. if yes, have reletbot move them to the renamed category. If not, the delete tag is wrongly placed. -- [[User:relet|relet]] 08:00, 21 May 2009 (UTC) | :I will check if someone has renamed the achievement.. if yes, have reletbot move them to the renamed category. If not, the delete tag is wrongly placed. -- [[User:relet|relet]] 08:00, 21 May 2009 (UTC) | ||
::Tagged as duplicated of [[:Category:Meetup geohash achievement]] - which is empty. Barring naming problems, I vote we delete the second one, and keep the first. --[[User:Joannac|joannac]] | ::Tagged as duplicated of [[:Category:Meetup geohash achievement]] - which is empty. Barring naming problems, I vote we delete the second one, and keep the first. --[[User:Joannac|joannac]] | ||
+ | |||
*[[:Category:National Parks]] got moved to [[:Category:Houston parks]] - is there some meaning of Houston I'm missing? | *[[:Category:National Parks]] got moved to [[:Category:Houston parks]] - is there some meaning of Houston I'm missing? | ||
:Not that I am aware of. I guess that's just a better classification for the pages that got categorized in the first place -- [[User:relet|relet]] 08:00, 21 May 2009 (UTC) | :Not that I am aware of. I guess that's just a better classification for the pages that got categorized in the first place -- [[User:relet|relet]] 08:00, 21 May 2009 (UTC) | ||
::None of those parks are in Houston (or Texas). Not sure why the name change | ::None of those parks are in Houston (or Texas). Not sure why the name change | ||
+ | |||
*All the old expedition pages with various levels of detail. We need to decide which to delete, and which to keep (and remove delete tags from) | *All the old expedition pages with various levels of detail. We need to decide which to delete, and which to keep (and remove delete tags from) | ||
:IMHO all that is either a) replaced by a correct page or b) expedition planning (unless it is very elaborate and worth reading) -- [[User:relet|relet]] 08:00, 21 May 2009 (UTC) | :IMHO all that is either a) replaced by a correct page or b) expedition planning (unless it is very elaborate and worth reading) -- [[User:relet|relet]] 08:00, 21 May 2009 (UTC) | ||
::See also [[User_talk:Robyn/2009Talk#Deletion_of_old_expedition_planning_pages|discussion here]] | ::See also [[User_talk:Robyn/2009Talk#Deletion_of_old_expedition_planning_pages|discussion here]] | ||
+ | |||
*[[Canandaigua-Corning, New York]] should probably only have one name. | *[[Canandaigua-Corning, New York]] should probably only have one name. | ||
:And a more pronounceable name in general, yes. :P -- [[User:relet|relet]] 12:21, 21 May 2009 (UTC) | :And a more pronounceable name in general, yes. :P -- [[User:relet|relet]] 12:21, 21 May 2009 (UTC) | ||
+ | |||
*HOLY CRAP [[World]] | *HOLY CRAP [[World]] | ||
:Yeah, that was created by some avid (anonymous? I don't remember) scripter.. I never saw the point, given that we have the Map statistics with clickable graticules. -- [[User:relet|relet]] 12:21, 21 May 2009 (UTC) | :Yeah, that was created by some avid (anonymous? I don't remember) scripter.. I never saw the point, given that we have the Map statistics with clickable graticules. -- [[User:relet|relet]] 12:21, 21 May 2009 (UTC) | ||
+ | :Support deletion. It's totally outdated and dawidi's map serves the purpose much better. --[[User:Ekorren|Ekorren]] 08:54, 22 May 2009 (UTC) | ||
+ | |||
*[[Fort Worth, Texas]] is moved to Ft. Worth; all the other "Fort" cities are unabbreviated. Ditto "Saint" cities. | *[[Fort Worth, Texas]] is moved to Ft. Worth; all the other "Fort" cities are unabbreviated. Ditto "Saint" cities. | ||
+ | |||
*Someone hit me over the head and tell me that keeping spam pages around when I have the most points is a BAD idea. | *Someone hit me over the head and tell me that keeping spam pages around when I have the most points is a BAD idea. | ||
+ | |||
*[[Main Page]] - should be [[Main page]]? (yes, i'm just getting really picky now) | *[[Main Page]] - should be [[Main page]]? (yes, i'm just getting really picky now) | ||
− | + | ||
+ | :Probably. And [[All Graticules]] should be [[All graticules]]. I just didn't dare to move them, because someone else's code relies on them. -- [[User:relet|relet]] 08:30, 22 May 2009 (UTC) | ||
Will add more as I discover them. --[[User:Joannac|joannac]] 01:48, 22 May 2009 (UTC) | Will add more as I discover them. --[[User:Joannac|joannac]] 01:48, 22 May 2009 (UTC) |
Revision as of 08:54, 22 May 2009
Notes regarding pages tagged for deletion
Just for one place to put all these. Please chip in with opinions. I will remove bullet points as they are resolved.
- Can I delete Bill Gates achievement (and associated pages) along with Expensive_Geohash (and associated pages)?
- support -- relet 08:00, 21 May 2009 (UTC)
- Against Bill Gates. It's humor. Expensive can go though. -- Wmcduff 12:30, 21 May 2009 (UTC)
- I say keep expensive as a way of recording unusually expensive adventures mykaDragonBlue [- i have no sig -] 01:48, 22 May 2009 (UTC)
- Keep Bill Gates, because it makes for a good laugh (and well illustrates the impossibility of cheating the algorithm which is doubted by almost everyone once in a while). "Expensive" was supposed to be turned into a "subjective" achievement, a task that's more served by the gratutious ribbons nowadays. I don't like to think of this as a regular achievement but would like to keep the ribbon available. --Ekorren 08:54, 22 May 2009 (UTC)
- Category:Meet-up achievement still has a whole bunch of pages in it
- I will check if someone has renamed the achievement.. if yes, have reletbot move them to the renamed category. If not, the delete tag is wrongly placed. -- relet 08:00, 21 May 2009 (UTC)
- Tagged as duplicated of Category:Meetup geohash achievement - which is empty. Barring naming problems, I vote we delete the second one, and keep the first. --joannac
- Category:National Parks got moved to Category:Houston parks - is there some meaning of Houston I'm missing?
- Not that I am aware of. I guess that's just a better classification for the pages that got categorized in the first place -- relet 08:00, 21 May 2009 (UTC)
- None of those parks are in Houston (or Texas). Not sure why the name change
- All the old expedition pages with various levels of detail. We need to decide which to delete, and which to keep (and remove delete tags from)
- IMHO all that is either a) replaced by a correct page or b) expedition planning (unless it is very elaborate and worth reading) -- relet 08:00, 21 May 2009 (UTC)
- See also discussion here
- Canandaigua-Corning, New York should probably only have one name.
- And a more pronounceable name in general, yes. :P -- relet 12:21, 21 May 2009 (UTC)
- HOLY CRAP World
- Yeah, that was created by some avid (anonymous? I don't remember) scripter.. I never saw the point, given that we have the Map statistics with clickable graticules. -- relet 12:21, 21 May 2009 (UTC)
- Support deletion. It's totally outdated and dawidi's map serves the purpose much better. --Ekorren 08:54, 22 May 2009 (UTC)
- Fort Worth, Texas is moved to Ft. Worth; all the other "Fort" cities are unabbreviated. Ditto "Saint" cities.
- Someone hit me over the head and tell me that keeping spam pages around when I have the most points is a BAD idea.
- Probably. And All Graticules should be All graticules. I just didn't dare to move them, because someone else's code relies on them. -- relet 08:30, 22 May 2009 (UTC)
Will add more as I discover them. --joannac 01:48, 22 May 2009 (UTC)