Difference between revisions of "Talk:2015-09-29 52 0"

From Geohashing
imported>Benjw
(thinking about a bus ride tomorrow)
imported>Sourcerer
m (Planning)
Line 3: Line 3:
 
:Looking at the [[Most_active_graticules|graticule statistics]], anyone a bit competitive would go for [[2015-09-30 52 0]]. It's a bit far for me though. --[[User:Sourcerer|Sourcerer]] ([[User talk:Sourcerer|talk]]) 10:19, 29 September 2015 (EDT)
 
:Looking at the [[Most_active_graticules|graticule statistics]], anyone a bit competitive would go for [[2015-09-30 52 0]]. It's a bit far for me though. --[[User:Sourcerer|Sourcerer]] ([[User talk:Sourcerer|talk]]) 10:19, 29 September 2015 (EDT)
 
::I was indeed just looking at [[2015-09-30 52 0]] and thinking about going.  Trouble is, it's a bit boring by car and it's an awkward place to get to by bike (I wouldn't cycle up the A10, and the alternative is a very circuitous route through lots of villages).  On the other hand, the number 9 bus goes from just down the road and will drop me a mile away in Ely centre.  Perhaps I will.  — <span style="text-shadow:grey 0.2em 0.2em 0.1em; class=texhtml">[[User:Benjw|Benjw]]</span>&nbsp; <sub>{[[User talk:Benjw|talk]]}</sub> 10:22, 29 September 2015 (EDT)
 
::I was indeed just looking at [[2015-09-30 52 0]] and thinking about going.  Trouble is, it's a bit boring by car and it's an awkward place to get to by bike (I wouldn't cycle up the A10, and the alternative is a very circuitous route through lots of villages).  On the other hand, the number 9 bus goes from just down the road and will drop me a mile away in Ely centre.  Perhaps I will.  — <span style="text-shadow:grey 0.2em 0.2em 0.1em; class=texhtml">[[User:Benjw|Benjw]]</span>&nbsp; <sub>{[[User talk:Benjw|talk]]}</sub> 10:22, 29 September 2015 (EDT)
 +
:::I've spotted a mistake in my expedition to [[2015-09-28 52 1]]. I have changed it from not-reached to reached. This slightly changes the [[Most_active_graticules|graticule statistics]]. I suspect that we'll share the most-active-graticule honours again. --[[User:Sourcerer|Sourcerer]] ([[User talk:Sourcerer|talk]]) 10:33, 29 September 2015 (EDT)

Revision as of 14:33, 29 September 2015

We're thinking of possibly popping down to Foxton after F finishes work and walking over to the hashpoint to arrive about 18:30. It's only a possibility though. Either way, it looks like we've got a good chance of being September's most active graticule. I personally find it pretty remarkable that we seem to be averaging roughly two hashes per week! Tongs (talk) 19:03, 28 September 2015 (EDT)

Well done Benjw. Once again Norwich and Cambridge are neck and neck. 2015-09-29 52 1 looks very reachable. 2015-09-30 52 1 might be unless there are grazing animals. 2015-09-30 52 0 near Ely looks possible but uninteresting. --Sourcerer (talk) 10:10, 29 September 2015 (EDT)
Looking at the graticule statistics, anyone a bit competitive would go for 2015-09-30 52 0. It's a bit far for me though. --Sourcerer (talk) 10:19, 29 September 2015 (EDT)
I was indeed just looking at 2015-09-30 52 0 and thinking about going. Trouble is, it's a bit boring by car and it's an awkward place to get to by bike (I wouldn't cycle up the A10, and the alternative is a very circuitous route through lots of villages). On the other hand, the number 9 bus goes from just down the road and will drop me a mile away in Ely centre. Perhaps I will. — Benjw  {talk} 10:22, 29 September 2015 (EDT)
I've spotted a mistake in my expedition to 2015-09-28 52 1. I have changed it from not-reached to reached. This slightly changes the graticule statistics. I suspect that we'll share the most-active-graticule honours again. --Sourcerer (talk) 10:33, 29 September 2015 (EDT)