Difference between revisions of "Talk:Low Geohash"

From Geohashing
imported>Yosef
imported>Solli
(Suspicious)
 
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 8: Line 8:
  
 
I think that Elbie and Geoff's geohashes were suspicious: they were on the ocean.  The elevation there is supposed to be sea level or zero meters.
 
I think that Elbie and Geoff's geohashes were suspicious: they were on the ocean.  The elevation there is supposed to be sea level or zero meters.
 +
:Depends on how you define "sea level" and normal height. On low tide you can be "below zero" while being above the water. But of course GPS based altimeters are not very exact, so this is not much of a proof. --[[User:Solli|Solli]] ([[User talk:Solli|talk]]) 16:58, 25 October 2017 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 16:58, 25 October 2017

WOW to that icon! -Robyn 17:23, 31 October 2008 (UTC)

Honorable Mention

I'm adding the honorable mention for anyone who can get below 100 meters below sea level. It's a lot harder than it sounds. Yosef (talk) 09:57, 17 September 2017 (UTC)

Suspicious

I think that Elbie and Geoff's geohashes were suspicious: they were on the ocean. The elevation there is supposed to be sea level or zero meters.

Depends on how you define "sea level" and normal height. On low tide you can be "below zero" while being above the water. But of course GPS based altimeters are not very exact, so this is not much of a proof. --Solli (talk) 16:58, 25 October 2017 (UTC)