Difference between revisions of "Talk:2010-01-24 -36 174"

Latest revision as of 00:05, 2 February 2010

Tale of Two Hashes

You qualify for a Tale of Two Hashes - check back about a week, there was a place in Germany or the Netherlands or something where the peeps went to a place called New Zealand - respond to their challenge and you should be OKs au.

chur

Kozz

The expedition: 2010-01-20 52 13. Congratulations! --ilpadre 09:40, 26 January 2010 (UTC)

Why don't you want to take the ribbon? :( You would be the first to win one of this sort! ;) :)--HiroProtagonist 20:17, 1 February 2010 (UTC)

But... but... they didn't SOLVE THE CRIME! -- relet 20:30, 1 February 2010 (UTC)

Maybe they did on todays hash?? --HiroProtagonist 20:58, 1 February 2010 (UTC)

Hi, okay, ive just discovered the 'discussion' pages and seen you all talking about this Tale of Two hashes award. Well I think I can now solve that crime! I assume the hashes don't have to be achieved on the same day therefore SUCCESS! Greenslime 00:05, 2 February 2010 (UTC)

@@ Line 6: / Line 6: @@
 Kozz
+:The expedition: [[2010-01-20 52 13]]. Congratulations! --[[User:Ilpadre|ilpadre]] 09:40, 26 January 2010 (UTC)
+::Why don't you want to take the ribbon? :( You would be the first to win one of this sort! ;) :)--[[User:HiroProtagonist|HiroProtagonist]] 20:17, 1 February 2010 (UTC)
+:::But... but... they didn't SOLVE THE CRIME! -- [[User:relet|relet]] 20:30, 1 February 2010 (UTC)
+::::Maybe they did on [[2010-02-01 -38 175|todays hash]]?? --[[User:HiroProtagonist|HiroProtagonist]] 20:58, 1 February 2010 (UTC)
+:::::Hi, okay, ive just discovered the 'discussion' pages and seen you all talking about this Tale of Two hashes award. Well I think I can now solve that crime! I assume the hashes don't have to be achieved on the same day therefore SUCCESS! [[User:Greenslime|Greenslime]] 00:05, 2 February 2010 (UTC)