Difference between revisions of "Talk:Posted achievement"
imported>Robyn (If you missed it, it must mean it isn't clear.) |
imported>Ekorren (There's always some "What about THIS case"...) |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
Yes, I intended it to apply to any geohash where you stopped because of a barrier, sign or even a bad feeling about accessing an area where you were not welcome. I thought I covered it with "Each "no trespassing" geohash you claim should link to an expedition report showing or describing the sign, fence or checkpoint that turned you back," but please edit the proposal to make the wording clearer. -[[User:Robyn|Robyn]] 05:06, 20 April 2009 (UTC) | Yes, I intended it to apply to any geohash where you stopped because of a barrier, sign or even a bad feeling about accessing an area where you were not welcome. I thought I covered it with "Each "no trespassing" geohash you claim should link to an expedition report showing or describing the sign, fence or checkpoint that turned you back," but please edit the proposal to make the wording clearer. -[[User:Robyn|Robyn]] 05:06, 20 April 2009 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | There's always a case of "how to deal with that?" and this time it's [[2009-03-08_48_8]]. Summarized: The first attempt failed because the way to get there was closed for public. However, there was probably a chance to get there from the other side, which, after two hours of getting stuck in snow, I called a MNB. Since the hash was probably in an area where it is illegal to leave ways, but probably very close to a way, I won't ever be able to tell moment whether it would have turned back to "No trespassing" if I had decided for another hour or two in that mess, unless I go back to visit the coordinates with better weather. | ||
| + | Now, would such a thing count for this? What about generally also counting MNB towards that achievement? --[[User:Ekorren|Ekorren]] 08:36, 20 April 2009 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 08:36, 20 April 2009
Sounds like a good achievement to me. Would private property with a fence but no sign count? I presume so. What about no fence either? Or did I miss the already existing clarifications in my late-night reading... --Thomcat 05:02, 20 April 2009 (UTC)
Yes, I intended it to apply to any geohash where you stopped because of a barrier, sign or even a bad feeling about accessing an area where you were not welcome. I thought I covered it with "Each "no trespassing" geohash you claim should link to an expedition report showing or describing the sign, fence or checkpoint that turned you back," but please edit the proposal to make the wording clearer. -Robyn 05:06, 20 April 2009 (UTC)
There's always a case of "how to deal with that?" and this time it's 2009-03-08_48_8. Summarized: The first attempt failed because the way to get there was closed for public. However, there was probably a chance to get there from the other side, which, after two hours of getting stuck in snow, I called a MNB. Since the hash was probably in an area where it is illegal to leave ways, but probably very close to a way, I won't ever be able to tell moment whether it would have turned back to "No trespassing" if I had decided for another hour or two in that mess, unless I go back to visit the coordinates with better weather. Now, would such a thing count for this? What about generally also counting MNB towards that achievement? --Ekorren 08:36, 20 April 2009 (UTC)
