Difference between revisions of "Talk:2009-03-12 37 -122"
From Geohashing
imported>Ted ((added .sig to pic comment)) |
imported>FunkyTuba |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Is it absolutely necessary to use a 2.5MB image, rather than one a lot closer to the 250kB (or is it 150kB?) guideline that is suggested? -- [[User:Benjw|Benjw]] 07:36, 13 March 2009 (UTC) | Is it absolutely necessary to use a 2.5MB image, rather than one a lot closer to the 250kB (or is it 150kB?) guideline that is suggested? -- [[User:Benjw|Benjw]] 07:36, 13 March 2009 (UTC) | ||
: Uploaded a 232k version (1/4 scale.) The warnings kick-in at 150k. I'll let FT play with the image further, if she wants to. [[User:Ted|Ted]] 15:24, 13 March 2009 (UTC) | : Uploaded a 232k version (1/4 scale.) The warnings kick-in at 150k. I'll let FT play with the image further, if she wants to. [[User:Ted|Ted]] 15:24, 13 March 2009 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | I was being lazy. Also I (mistakenly) thought that resizing within the wiki would help with the bandwidth issue. The image wasn't linked to the main page so I figured the impact would be minimal. I apologize for the inconvenience. [[User:FunkyTuba|FunkyTuba]] 18:30, 13 March 2009 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 18:30, 13 March 2009
Is it absolutely necessary to use a 2.5MB image, rather than one a lot closer to the 250kB (or is it 150kB?) guideline that is suggested? -- Benjw 07:36, 13 March 2009 (UTC)
- Uploaded a 232k version (1/4 scale.) The warnings kick-in at 150k. I'll let FT play with the image further, if she wants to. Ted 15:24, 13 March 2009 (UTC)
I was being lazy. Also I (mistakenly) thought that resizing within the wiki would help with the bandwidth issue. The image wasn't linked to the main page so I figured the impact would be minimal. I apologize for the inconvenience. FunkyTuba 18:30, 13 March 2009 (UTC)
