Difference between revisions of "Talk:Graticule Unlocked/worksheet"
From Geohashing
imported>Robyn (Yes, she is.) |
imported>Joannac (well, what are you waiting for?) |
||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
:::I suggest you sort it by latitude, maybe, and put each one in a different section? That way others (i.e. me) can help you compile the list. --[[User:Joannac|joannac]] 04:37, 15 June 2009 (UTC) | :::I suggest you sort it by latitude, maybe, and put each one in a different section? That way others (i.e. me) can help you compile the list. --[[User:Joannac|joannac]] 04:37, 15 June 2009 (UTC) | ||
::::I was hoping to enlist the help of the person who does [[Maps and Statistics]] to do something cool with it, and/or integrate the data into one of those maps, so it doesn't end up looking like [[All Graticules]]. It most definitely requires sorting, and by latitude is better than by date. -[[User:Robyn|Robyn]] 04:40, 15 June 2009 (UTC) | ::::I was hoping to enlist the help of the person who does [[Maps and Statistics]] to do something cool with it, and/or integrate the data into one of those maps, so it doesn't end up looking like [[All Graticules]]. It most definitely requires sorting, and by latitude is better than by date. -[[User:Robyn|Robyn]] 04:40, 15 June 2009 (UTC) | ||
| + | :::::Well, he's online. Come online and propose it? Or do you want me to do it? --[[User:Joannac|joannac]] 04:43, 15 June 2009 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 04:43, 15 June 2009
And I was hoping this would have data in it. :-(
- Well aren't you glad I at least put off deleting it :p --joannac 04:27, 15 June 2009 (UTC)
- Seriously, I was just about to create something similar, as soon as I'd ironed out the problem currently being discussed on Talk:Virgin Graticule. It looks as if Thomcat has abandoned it, but that's no reason why I can't take it back. I'm going to restore the data and continue. -Robyn 04:31, 15 June 2009 (UTC)
- Heh. Precisely the reason I kept it. I thought it would come in useful one day, and I was right?
- I suggest you sort it by latitude, maybe, and put each one in a different section? That way others (i.e. me) can help you compile the list. --joannac 04:37, 15 June 2009 (UTC)
- I was hoping to enlist the help of the person who does Maps and Statistics to do something cool with it, and/or integrate the data into one of those maps, so it doesn't end up looking like All Graticules. It most definitely requires sorting, and by latitude is better than by date. -Robyn 04:40, 15 June 2009 (UTC)
- Well, he's online. Come online and propose it? Or do you want me to do it? --joannac 04:43, 15 June 2009 (UTC)
- I was hoping to enlist the help of the person who does Maps and Statistics to do something cool with it, and/or integrate the data into one of those maps, so it doesn't end up looking like All Graticules. It most definitely requires sorting, and by latitude is better than by date. -Robyn 04:40, 15 June 2009 (UTC)
- Seriously, I was just about to create something similar, as soon as I'd ironed out the problem currently being discussed on Talk:Virgin Graticule. It looks as if Thomcat has abandoned it, but that's no reason why I can't take it back. I'm going to restore the data and continue. -Robyn 04:31, 15 June 2009 (UTC)
