Difference between revisions of "Category talk:Expedition planning"
From Geohashing
imported>Robyn (Right.) |
imported>Aperfectring |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
:It took me a moment to understand what you meant, but yes, because Current events will list upcoming planned expeditions, there is no need to worry about old planned expeditions making it hard for people to find current ones. You can leave them for historical interest. What a happy side benefit of the Current events project. -[[User:Robyn|Robyn]] 02:00, 17 June 2009 (UTC) | :It took me a moment to understand what you meant, but yes, because Current events will list upcoming planned expeditions, there is no need to worry about old planned expeditions making it hard for people to find current ones. You can leave them for historical interest. What a happy side benefit of the Current events project. -[[User:Robyn|Robyn]] 02:00, 17 June 2009 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | ::/me starts feeling a great deal of pressure on his shoulders. =D --[[User:Aperfectring|aperfectring]] 02:30, 17 June 2009 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 02:30, 17 June 2009
I am keeping anything that is a decent shot at planning (>1 person, or concrete plans on how to get to the hash). Now that Current Events is being populated, there is no need to keep only recent pages in the category, it can serve as a history of planning expeditions. Right? --joannac 00:59, 17 June 2009 (UTC)
- It took me a moment to understand what you meant, but yes, because Current events will list upcoming planned expeditions, there is no need to worry about old planned expeditions making it hard for people to find current ones. You can leave them for historical interest. What a happy side benefit of the Current events project. -Robyn 02:00, 17 June 2009 (UTC)
- /me starts feeling a great deal of pressure on his shoulders. =D --aperfectring 02:30, 17 June 2009 (UTC)
