Difference between revisions of "Talk:Most active graticules/old"

Revision as of 19:42, 11 February 2009

Discussion

Final 2008 statistics at 2008 Most active graticules and archived talk at Talk:2008 Most active graticules.

Editor's Note

The totals for January 2009 are in, and my local charts are updated with the results of Benjw hunting for expeditions - thanks! Our big monthly winner is Atlanta, Georgia in each category (you guys know that it's okay to document unsuccessful expeditions, right?). Runners up include Mannheim, Germany, Pforzheim, Germany, and my own Seattle, Washington.

I changed the chart around also, so all of 2008 is in one column. We will continue to grow through 2009, then do chart compaction again in early 2010.

See you next month! --Thomcat 17:58, 11 February 2009 (UTC)

Not Quite on Topic

I would be interested in seeing a graph, automated if possible, showing the number of active graticules and the number of expeditions mounted on a month-to-month basis. I'm still trying to figure out if our sport is growing slowly, static, flaring up randomly in various places and then dying down again or what. The fact that I singlehandedly got Slave Lake an award last August says that things were pretty slow then. -Robyn 19:42, 11 February 2009 (UTC)

@@ Line 11: / Line 11: @@
 See you next month!
 --[[User:Thomcat|Thomcat]] 17:58, 11 February 2009 (UTC)
+===Not Quite on Topic===
+I would be interested in seeing a graph, automated if possible, showing the number of active graticules and the number of expeditions mounted on a month-to-month basis. I'm still trying to figure out if our sport is growing slowly, static, flaring up randomly in various places and then dying down again or what. The fact that I singlehandedly got Slave Lake an award last August says that things were pretty slow then. -[[User:Robyn|Robyn]] 19:42, 11 February 2009 (UTC)