Category talk:Tagged for deletion
From Geohashing
Revision as of 10:12, 22 May 2009 by imported>MykaDragonBlue (seconding joanna re Category:Meet-up achievement)
Notes regarding pages tagged for deletion
Just for one place to put all these. Please chip in with opinions. I will remove bullet points as they are resolved.
- Can I delete Bill Gates achievement (and associated pages) along with Expensive_Geohash (and associated pages)?
- support -- relet 08:00, 21 May 2009 (UTC)
- Against Bill Gates. It's humor. Expensive can go though. -- Wmcduff 12:30, 21 May 2009 (UTC)
- I say keep expensive as a way of recording unusually expensive adventures mykaDragonBlue [- i have no sig -] 01:48, 22 May 2009 (UTC)
- Keep Bill Gates, because it makes for a good laugh (and well illustrates the impossibility of cheating the algorithm which is doubted by almost everyone once in a while). "Expensive" was supposed to be turned into a "subjective" achievement, a task that's more served by the gratutious ribbons nowadays. I don't like to think of this as a regular achievement but would like to keep the ribbon available. --Ekorren 08:54, 22 May 2009 (UTC)
- Category:Meet-up achievement still has a whole bunch of pages in it
- I will check if someone has renamed the achievement.. if yes, have reletbot move them to the renamed category. If not, the delete tag is wrongly placed. -- relet 08:00, 21 May 2009 (UTC)
- Tagged as duplicated of Category:Meetup geohash achievement - which is empty. Barring naming problems, I vote we delete the second one, and keep the first. --joannac
- seconded mykaDragonBlue [- i have no sig -] 10:12, 22 May 2009 (UTC)
- Tagged as duplicated of Category:Meetup geohash achievement - which is empty. Barring naming problems, I vote we delete the second one, and keep the first. --joannac
- Category:National Parks got moved to Category:Houston parks - is there some meaning of Houston I'm missing?
- Not that I am aware of. I guess that's just a better classification for the pages that got categorized in the first place -- relet 08:00, 21 May 2009 (UTC)
- None of those parks are in Houston (or Texas). Not sure why the name change
- All the old expedition pages with various levels of detail. We need to decide which to delete, and which to keep (and remove delete tags from)
- IMHO all that is either a) replaced by a correct page or b) expedition planning (unless it is very elaborate and worth reading) -- relet 08:00, 21 May 2009 (UTC)
- See also discussion here
- Canandaigua-Corning, New York should probably only have one name.
- And a more pronounceable name in general, yes. :P -- relet 12:21, 21 May 2009 (UTC)
- HOLY CRAP World
- Yeah, that was created by some avid (anonymous? I don't remember) scripter.. I never saw the point, given that we have the Map statistics with clickable graticules. -- relet 12:21, 21 May 2009 (UTC)
- Support deletion. It's totally outdated and dawidi's map serves the purpose much better. --Ekorren 08:54, 22 May 2009 (UTC)
- Fort Worth, Texas is moved to Ft. Worth; all the other "Fort" cities are unabbreviated. Ditto "Saint" cities.
- Someone hit me over the head and tell me that keeping spam pages around when I have the most points is a BAD idea.
- Probably. And All Graticules should be All graticules. I just didn't dare to move them, because someone else's code relies on them. -- relet 08:30, 22 May 2009 (UTC)
Will add more as I discover them. --joannac 01:48, 22 May 2009 (UTC)