Difference between revisions of "Category talk:Tagged for deletion"

Revision as of 08:54, 22 May 2009

Notes regarding pages tagged for deletion

Just for one place to put all these. Please chip in with opinions. I will remove bullet points as they are resolved.

Can I delete Bill Gates achievement (and associated pages) along with Expensive_Geohash (and associated pages)?

support -- relet 08:00, 21 May 2009 (UTC)

Against Bill Gates. It's humor. Expensive can go though. -- Wmcduff 12:30, 21 May 2009 (UTC)

I say keep expensive as a way of recording unusually expensive adventures mykaDragonBlue [- i have no sig -] 01:48, 22 May 2009 (UTC)

Keep Bill Gates, because it makes for a good laugh (and well illustrates the impossibility of cheating the algorithm which is doubted by almost everyone once in a while). "Expensive" was supposed to be turned into a "subjective" achievement, a task that's more served by the gratutious ribbons nowadays. I don't like to think of this as a regular achievement but would like to keep the ribbon available. --Ekorren 08:54, 22 May 2009 (UTC)

Category:Meet-up achievement still has a whole bunch of pages in it

I will check if someone has renamed the achievement.. if yes, have reletbot move them to the renamed category. If not, the delete tag is wrongly placed. -- relet 08:00, 21 May 2009 (UTC)

Tagged as duplicated of Category:Meetup geohash achievement - which is empty. Barring naming problems, I vote we delete the second one, and keep the first. --joannac

Category:National Parks got moved to Category:Houston parks - is there some meaning of Houston I'm missing?

Not that I am aware of. I guess that's just a better classification for the pages that got categorized in the first place -- relet 08:00, 21 May 2009 (UTC)

None of those parks are in Houston (or Texas). Not sure why the name change

All the old expedition pages with various levels of detail. We need to decide which to delete, and which to keep (and remove delete tags from)

IMHO all that is either a) replaced by a correct page or b) expedition planning (unless it is very elaborate and worth reading) -- relet 08:00, 21 May 2009 (UTC)

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
 == Notes regarding pages tagged for deletion ==
 Just for one place to put all these. Please chip in with opinions. I will remove bullet points as they are resolved.
 *Can I delete [[Bill Gates achievement]] (and associated pages) along with [[Expensive_Geohash]] (and associated pages)?
 :support -- [[User:relet|relet]] 08:00, 21 May 2009 (UTC)
 :Against Bill Gates.  It's humor.  Expensive can go though. -- [[User:Wmcduff|Wmcduff]] 12:30, 21 May 2009 (UTC)
 :I say keep expensive as a way of recording unusually expensive adventures [[User:MykaDragonBlue|mykaDragonBlue &#91;- i have no sig -&#93;]] 01:48, 22 May 2009 (UTC)
+:Keep Bill Gates, because it makes for a good laugh (and well illustrates the impossibility of cheating the algorithm which is doubted by almost everyone once in a while). "Expensive" was supposed to be turned into a "subjective" achievement, a task that's more served by the gratutious ribbons nowadays. I don't like to think of this as a regular ''achievement'' but would like to keep the ''ribbon'' available. --[[User:Ekorren|Ekorren]] 08:54, 22 May 2009 (UTC)
 *[[:Category:Meet-up achievement]] still has a whole bunch of pages in it
 :I will check if someone has renamed the achievement.. if yes, have reletbot move them to the renamed category. If not, the delete tag is wrongly placed. -- [[User:relet|relet]] 08:00, 21 May 2009 (UTC)
 ::Tagged as duplicated of [[:Category:Meetup geohash achievement]] - which is empty. Barring naming problems, I vote we delete the second one, and keep the first. --[[User:Joannac|joannac]]
 *[[:Category:National Parks]] got moved to [[:Category:Houston parks]] - is there some meaning of Houston I'm missing?
 :Not that I am aware of. I guess that's just a better classification for the pages that got categorized in the first place -- [[User:relet|relet]] 08:00, 21 May 2009 (UTC)
 ::None of those parks are in Houston (or Texas). Not sure why the name change
 *All the old expedition pages with various levels of detail. We need to decide which to delete, and which to keep (and remove delete tags from)
 :IMHO all that is either a) replaced by a correct page or b) expedition planning (unless it is very elaborate and worth reading) -- [[User:relet|relet]] 08:00, 21 May 2009 (UTC)
 ::See also [[User_talk:Robyn/2009Talk#Deletion_of_old_expedition_planning_pages|discussion here]]
 *[[Canandaigua-Corning, New York]] should probably only have one name.
 :And a more pronounceable name in general, yes. :P -- [[User:relet|relet]] 12:21, 21 May 2009 (UTC)
 *HOLY CRAP [[World]]
 :Yeah, that was created by some avid (anonymous? I don't remember) scripter.. I never saw the point, given that we have the Map statistics with clickable graticules. -- [[User:relet|relet]] 12:21, 21 May 2009 (UTC)
+:Support deletion. It's totally outdated and dawidi's map serves the purpose much better. --[[User:Ekorren|Ekorren]] 08:54, 22 May 2009 (UTC)
 *[[Fort Worth, Texas]] is moved to Ft. Worth; all the other "Fort" cities are unabbreviated. Ditto "Saint" cities.
 *Someone hit me over the head and tell me that keeping spam pages around when I have the most points is a BAD idea.
 *[[Main Page]] - should be [[Main page]]? (yes, i'm just getting really picky now)
-*:Probably. And [[All Graticules]] should be [[All graticules]]. I just didn't dare to move them, because someone else's code relies on them. -- [[User:relet|relet]] 08:30, 22 May 2009 (UTC)
+:Probably. And [[All Graticules]] should be [[All graticules]]. I just didn't dare to move them, because someone else's code relies on them. -- [[User:relet|relet]] 08:30, 22 May 2009 (UTC)
 Will add more as I discover them. --[[User:Joannac|joannac]] 01:48, 22 May 2009 (UTC)