Category talk:Tagged for deletion

From Geohashing
Revision as of 08:30, 22 May 2009 by imported>Relet

Notes regarding pages tagged for deletion

Just for one place to put all these. Please chip in with opinions. I will remove bullet points as they are resolved.

support -- relet 08:00, 21 May 2009 (UTC)
Against Bill Gates. It's humor. Expensive can go though. -- Wmcduff 12:30, 21 May 2009 (UTC)
I say keep expensive as a way of recording unusually expensive adventures mykaDragonBlue [- i have no sig -] 01:48, 22 May 2009 (UTC)
I will check if someone has renamed the achievement.. if yes, have reletbot move them to the renamed category. If not, the delete tag is wrongly placed. -- relet 08:00, 21 May 2009 (UTC)
Tagged as duplicated of Category:Meetup geohash achievement - which is empty. Barring naming problems, I vote we delete the second one, and keep the first. --joannac
Not that I am aware of. I guess that's just a better classification for the pages that got categorized in the first place -- relet 08:00, 21 May 2009 (UTC)
None of those parks are in Houston (or Texas). Not sure why the name change
  • All the old expedition pages with various levels of detail. We need to decide which to delete, and which to keep (and remove delete tags from)
IMHO all that is either a) replaced by a correct page or b) expedition planning (unless it is very elaborate and worth reading) -- relet 08:00, 21 May 2009 (UTC)
See also discussion here
And a more pronounceable name in general, yes. :P -- relet 12:21, 21 May 2009 (UTC)
Yeah, that was created by some avid (anonymous? I don't remember) scripter.. I never saw the point, given that we have the Map statistics with clickable graticules. -- relet 12:21, 21 May 2009 (UTC)
  • Fort Worth, Texas is moved to Ft. Worth; all the other "Fort" cities are unabbreviated. Ditto "Saint" cities.
  • Someone hit me over the head and tell me that keeping spam pages around when I have the most points is a BAD idea.
  • Main Page - should be Main page? (yes, i'm just getting really picky now)
    Probably. And All Graticules should be All graticules. I just didn't dare to move them, because someone else's code relies on them. -- relet 08:30, 22 May 2009 (UTC)

Will add more as I discover them. --joannac 01:48, 22 May 2009 (UTC)