Difference between revisions of "Talk:2009-03-30 48 8"
From Geohashing
imported>Koepfel |
imported>Ncbears (Jurassic Hash?) |
||
| (2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Great you made it there! The hashpoint is not far from the [[2009-01-12 48 8]] point Ekorren and I visited two months ago. But the weather was friendlier today. ;) --[[User:Ilpadre|Ilpadre]] 14:23, 30 March 2009 (UTC) | Great you made it there! The hashpoint is not far from the [[2009-01-12 48 8]] point Ekorren and I visited two months ago. But the weather was friendlier today. ;) --[[User:Ilpadre|Ilpadre]] 14:23, 30 March 2009 (UTC) | ||
:Yes, the weather was awesome, I think I even have a light sunburn. I thought about stppping by your hashpoint on my way to Lauterbourg, if I'd have missed my train, but I still made it on time. Fluxkompensator and I discussed, if this expedition will qualify me for a 3-region [[Reverse Regional achievement]], since I now visited Hashpoints in Baden-Württemberg, Rheinland-Pfalz and Alsace in 48,8. Would that count? [[User:Koepfel|Koepfel]] <sub><small><small>[[User_talk:Koepfel|talk]]</small></small></sub> 18:01, 30 March 2009 (UTC) | :Yes, the weather was awesome, I think I even have a light sunburn. I thought about stppping by your hashpoint on my way to Lauterbourg, if I'd have missed my train, but I still made it on time. Fluxkompensator and I discussed, if this expedition will qualify me for a 3-region [[Reverse Regional achievement]], since I now visited Hashpoints in Baden-Württemberg, Rheinland-Pfalz and Alsace in 48,8. Would that count? [[User:Koepfel|Koepfel]] <sub><small><small>[[User_talk:Koepfel|talk]]</small></small></sub> 18:01, 30 March 2009 (UTC) | ||
| + | ::I would say, yes. German ''Bundesländer'' and french ''Regions'' are comparable region levels. Both of them are the highest administrative level below the whole country, after all, and also if you go to ''Departements'' in France (which would be a far smaller unit than the ''Bundesländer'') it wouldn't change anything, as all french parts of 48,8 are in ''Bas-Rhin''. --[[User:Ekorren|Ekorren]] 19:51, 30 March 2009 (UTC) | ||
| + | :::That sound reasonable, thanks. I'm gonna add it to the achievements page. [[User:Koepfel|Koepfel]] <sub><small><small>[[User_talk:Koepfel|talk]]</small></small></sub> 20:33, 30 March 2009 (UTC) | ||
| + | OK, you got me with the wildlife picture. I had to look closely before I realized you were hashing in Jurassic Park! --[[User:Ncbears|NCBears]] 15:37, 3 April 2009 (UTC) | ||
Latest revision as of 15:37, 3 April 2009
Great you made it there! The hashpoint is not far from the 2009-01-12 48 8 point Ekorren and I visited two months ago. But the weather was friendlier today. ;) --Ilpadre 14:23, 30 March 2009 (UTC)
- Yes, the weather was awesome, I think I even have a light sunburn. I thought about stppping by your hashpoint on my way to Lauterbourg, if I'd have missed my train, but I still made it on time. Fluxkompensator and I discussed, if this expedition will qualify me for a 3-region Reverse Regional achievement, since I now visited Hashpoints in Baden-Württemberg, Rheinland-Pfalz and Alsace in 48,8. Would that count? Koepfel talk 18:01, 30 March 2009 (UTC)
- I would say, yes. German Bundesländer and french Regions are comparable region levels. Both of them are the highest administrative level below the whole country, after all, and also if you go to Departements in France (which would be a far smaller unit than the Bundesländer) it wouldn't change anything, as all french parts of 48,8 are in Bas-Rhin. --Ekorren 19:51, 30 March 2009 (UTC)
OK, you got me with the wildlife picture. I had to look closely before I realized you were hashing in Jurassic Park! --NCBears 15:37, 3 April 2009 (UTC)
