Talk:Time-traveller achievement
Anyone come close?
Seeing as no one has this badge, I tried for it today, 2008-09-13. I failed by 17 minutes (proof pending the pictures come out well.) Has anyone else done better?
- I normally geohash by bicycle, so out of the question, but in the right circumstances I could get this one as an air hash. I think you're the first to try, though. Splendid effort! -Robyn 06:45, 14 September 2008 (UTC)
- Guys ... I've had a killer idea. Four words: End of Daylight Savings. I'm going to suggest this to my local chapter. It's particularly good for us as we don't live anywhere near a timezone border (UK). I could make it a quasi-cross-border one as well by going between England and Wales, in whichever direction is COUNTER to the usual way you'd do it by skipping timezones. It shouldn't be too difficult to achieve by car in this part of the world as the graticules are only 40-50 miles "across" (though still like 70-80 miles "high") and the roads are fairly good - and will be empty at that time. (No account yet i'm afraid) 77.102.101.220 18:26, 12 October 2008 (UTC)
- You know, I thought of that a long time ago, but for some reason I thought this achievement had been wordedto require two Saturday 4 pm meetups. If you can get to two at two am, or whenever your local daylight savings cuts in, all power to you. I'd recommend practicing in daylight before the actual event.
- Travelling E<>W across my local graticule to visit relatives and friends who live far enough away that they're a full degree or more distant count?
- If the two hashes are in different time zones (either permanently, or because of daylight savings), then yes. That's the idea. I have proven in the past that you -can- reach two hashes E<>W in less than one hour. It depends a lot on the road network. -- Relet 19:13, 15 October 2008 (UTC)
- I kinda meant "does that count as practicing", but eh :) At the mo it looks like it's going to be tight, and I need to get cracking in a moment. Tahrey 22:57, 25 October 2008 (UTC)
- If the two hashes are in different time zones (either permanently, or because of daylight savings), then yes. That's the idea. I have proven in the past that you -can- reach two hashes E<>W in less than one hour. It depends a lot on the road network. -- Relet 19:13, 15 October 2008 (UTC)
- I'm sure I've cracked the hour at much less amenable times of day before... it's a lot easier to go that way than N<>S around here! I may try a daylight practice (or at least, early night time, as it's already practically dark outside and I haven't left work yet), I'm just waiting for a day where the co-ordinates aren't a stupid distance away from work, home, or any point in-between! Getting to some distant spot for 2am would be easy - but not for 6pm ;). Actually I'm wondering if a double one is possible... be somewhere at a little before 1am (and wait for the clock to tick over), then zoom across one graticule to land on another just before 2am becomes 1.01.... and go from there onwards to a third for the second 1.59!
- Well, time zones are usually more than one graticule wide. ;) -- Relet 19:13, 15 October 2008 (UTC)
- Then that may make this kind of unique ... you can easily do the 2-part one over a timezone as you don't need to go across a whole one, just cross the border. This may be tantamount to teleportation ;) Tahrey 22:57, 25 October 2008 (UTC)
- Well, time zones are usually more than one graticule wide. ;) -- Relet 19:13, 15 October 2008 (UTC)
- ...and drive two hours back home to crawl into bed at a 4am that's actually 5. Good thing it's sunday morning, eh - and the sun won't be up for another hour or two.
- Sorry, miscalculated there. 3am that's usually 4. I think. Erm. Tahrey 22:57, 25 October 2008 (UTC)
- Travelling E<>W across my local graticule to visit relatives and friends who live far enough away that they're a full degree or more distant count?
- The problem I guess would be getting the proof. I don't have a GPS or sat nav, and am unlikely to own one in the next couple weeks. Could borrow one --- MAYBE. But difficult questions would be asked. The best I could do is turn up at the points and somehow try to prove my timing (maybe a video, with the car radio timecheck in the background) and location (take copious pictures with benefit of headlamps and try to match them up with any daylight shots, map, and online aerial photos?).
- Proof can be a timing device and some photos of identifiable landmarks. Headlamps will help there at night. ;) -- Relet 19:13, 15 October 2008 (UTC)
- I've been trying to scout for landmarks on Google maps. I'm going for this one as the hashpoints are, quite conveniently, just in the right locations to be reasonably accessible on foot, but also just-about legally drivable including the foot travel and stop-offs. Tahrey 22:57, 25 October 2008 (UTC)
- Proof can be a timing device and some photos of identifiable landmarks. Headlamps will help there at night. ;) -- Relet 19:13, 15 October 2008 (UTC)
- The problem I guess would be getting the proof. I don't have a GPS or sat nav, and am unlikely to own one in the next couple weeks. Could borrow one --- MAYBE. But difficult questions would be asked. The best I could do is turn up at the points and somehow try to prove my timing (maybe a video, with the car radio timecheck in the background) and location (take copious pictures with benefit of headlamps and try to match them up with any daylight shots, map, and online aerial photos?).
- (Considered a four-stop interlaced one, but that would just be too difficult and too illegal without actually having a helicopter or at least a fast microlight with a floodlamp mounted on it ... conceptually possible by road in a moderately fast car given the clear roads, but death and/or jail would await, as well as being stripped of any potential award) (BTW, I am 77.102.101.220) 193.63.174.10 17:32, 15 October 2008 (UTC)
- Additional to that --- have looked into hitting the 25th and 26th october ones one after the other as they initially looked reasonably close (and i'm not sure at what point the Geohashing "day" starts - midnight? or later?), but the extra travel distance involved makes it just a bit impractical. I could probably manage an 85mph average speed in my clapped out old transport, but the constabulary might have something to say about it. Tahrey 22:57, 25 October 2008 (UTC)
- (Considered a four-stop interlaced one, but that would just be too difficult and too illegal without actually having a helicopter or at least a fast microlight with a floodlamp mounted on it ... conceptually possible by road in a moderately fast car given the clear roads, but death and/or jail would await, as well as being stripped of any potential award) (BTW, I am 77.102.101.220) 193.63.174.10 17:32, 15 October 2008 (UTC)
Hmm, I crossed a time zone today and hashed each side of it. But I doubt it was at exactly the same time. That would be too freaky for words. -Robyn 01:26, 13 October 2008 (UTC)
- Awwww, you need to try it for serious :) Tahrey 22:57, 25 October 2008 (UTC)
well, crap
It might have been possible had it been dry and a bit warmer, but I kind of reckoned without mother nature pulling a fast one and bringing on quite a wind and rain storm, and what that would mean re: visibility, grip and my own bottle vs travel speed in concert with the fairly insane hills and bends that I didn't expect to find on supposed A-roads just 30-odd miles out of the dull flatness that is the N.Brum area. I am her bitch, and there's probably a couple other "fail" "awards" to be had once I figure it out .... after having a sleep, and seeing if the engine sounds rough and the brakes still work on the jalopy come the morning. I at least got some photos of the rough area of one of them, and shots documenting position at time of fail. Admittedly I was almost 20 minutes later than desired leaving the house, but I would have needed to budget a further 10-15 on TOP of that just to manage it all successfully whilst still driving like a man posessed.
"Better luck next year", maybe? :) 77.102.101.220 03:07, 26 October 2008 (UTC)
