Difference between revisions of "Category talk:Tagged for deletion"
imported>Joannac m (+2 HOLY CRAP) |
m |
||
(58 intermediate revisions by 12 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
== Notes regarding pages tagged for deletion == | == Notes regarding pages tagged for deletion == | ||
Just for one place to put all these. Please chip in with opinions. I will remove bullet points as they are resolved. | Just for one place to put all these. Please chip in with opinions. I will remove bullet points as they are resolved. | ||
− | + | ||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
*All the old expedition pages with various levels of detail. We need to decide which to delete, and which to keep (and remove delete tags from) | *All the old expedition pages with various levels of detail. We need to decide which to delete, and which to keep (and remove delete tags from) | ||
:IMHO all that is either a) replaced by a correct page or b) expedition planning (unless it is very elaborate and worth reading) -- [[User:relet|relet]] 08:00, 21 May 2009 (UTC) | :IMHO all that is either a) replaced by a correct page or b) expedition planning (unless it is very elaborate and worth reading) -- [[User:relet|relet]] 08:00, 21 May 2009 (UTC) | ||
− | *[[ | + | ::See also [[User_talk:Robyn/2009Talk#Deletion_of_old_expedition_planning_pages|discussion here]] |
− | *[[ | + | :::I find the fact that someone once started to plan an expedition in a graticule where I am interesting, if it's the only activity for that graticule. The catalogues of "point was here, no one went" can definitely go. -[[User:Robyn|Robyn]] 18:38, 22 May 2009 (UTC) |
− | + | *Ok, this is what I'm doing for these | |
+ | **Anything that has a suggestion that someone went stays. | ||
+ | **Anything that has some description of the hashpoint gets put on the grat page. Yes, I know this is confusing for grats that are still active. No, I don't care (unless someone has a better solution). | ||
+ | **Everything else gets deleted. | ||
+ | Comments? --[[User:Joannac|joannac]] 05:49, 25 May 2009 (UTC) | ||
+ | :I think that's a good strategy; well done. -- [[User:Benjw|Benjw]] 08:34, 25 May 2009 (UTC) | ||
+ | :Oh, btw, it's really time consuming and boring. So no chance of me flooding recent changes again. --[[User:Joannac|joannac]] 05:57, 25 May 2009 (UTC) | ||
+ | ::All that you've done already is very much appreciated, so thankyou for that. As for the rest, just do one or two every now and then; they'll get done eventually. -- [[User:Benjw|Benjw]] 08:34, 25 May 2009 (UTC) | ||
+ | :::That is appreciated and sensitive to what will eventually be the hallowed early history of our sport. (shovel, shovel) :-) -[[User:Robyn|Robyn]] 22:54, 26 May 2009 (UTC) | ||
+ | |||
+ | *[[Main Page]] - should be ''Main page''? (yes, i'm just getting really picky now) | ||
+ | :Probably. And [[All Graticules]] should be ''All graticules''. I just didn't dare to move them, because someone else's code relies on them. -- [[User:relet|relet]] 08:30, 22 May 2009 (UTC) | ||
+ | ::Set up a redirect, at least, if the code can't be changed. -- [[User:Benjw|Benjw]] 11:34, 22 May 2009 (UTC) | ||
+ | :::I much prefer it '''Main Page'''. Wikipedia, from where we copied our naming conventions uses Main Page, so so can we. I wouldn't object at all to '''All graticules''', if it doesn't bother Zigdon's code. -[[User:Robyn|Robyn]] 18:38, 22 May 2009 (UTC) | ||
+ | ::::All_Graticules is regularily read by at least three external applications. But as long as there is a redirect, they should get served the correct page through the redirect anyway. And even ''if'' that won't work for all of them, it would be work for half a minute each to fix up the applications. --[[User:Ekorren|Ekorren]] 20:19, 22 May 2009 (UTC) | ||
+ | :Actually, I just noticed the icon links to Main Page (capital P). So I don't think we should change it unless we can change that too. --[[User:Joannac|joannac]] 23:39, 24 May 2009 (UTC) | ||
+ | :I don't think you can move Main_Page without changing the code. Example, "/" redirects to "/Main_Page". This one specifically is probably not worth the hassle of changing. --[[User:Davidc|davidc]] 23:03, 30 September 2009 (UTC) | ||
+ | |||
+ | :[[User:Wnvoss]] seems to have turned into [[User:Ssov]], and then removed himself from almost every place he was mentioned. Should I finish removing him from the wiki (so it's like he never existed)? --[[User:Joannac|joannac]] 06:28, 7 June 2009 (UTC) | ||
+ | ::Would you make me have never existed if I asked? Set a precedent you want to uphold. Are you going to delete pictures he appears in? -[[User:Robyn|Robyn]] 07:24, 7 June 2009 (UTC) | ||
+ | |||
+ | Will add more as I discover them. --[[User:Joannac|joannac]] 01:48, 22 May 2009 (UTC) | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | See also [[User:Joannac/Todo]] | ||
+ | |||
+ | == Deletion spree January 2012 == | ||
+ | '''Update: all done. Leave a note on [[User_talk:Joannac|my talk page]] if anything/anyone got deleted/banned in error. --[[User:Joannac|joannac]] 17:55, 7 January 2012 (EST) | ||
+ | ---- | ||
+ | Hello all, | ||
+ | |||
+ | On my request, Joannac is gonna delete all old pages and images in this category. We got a week to check if there are no pages which wrongly have the delete tag. | ||
+ | |||
+ | To order this a bit I suggest that anyone checking some pages do so in the order they are in the category (alphabetical) and reports their progress here. I will check some if/when I got time. - [[User:CO2|CO2]] 18:44, 30 December 2011 (EST) | ||
+ | |||
+ | -- | ||
+ | |||
+ | I am done checking everything: | ||
+ | |||
+ | '''Categories: DONE.''' | ||
+ | |||
+ | '''Pages: DONE.''' | ||
+ | |||
+ | '''Media: DONE.''' | ||
+ | |||
+ | '''[[Special:UnusedFiles|Category:Orphaned_files]]: DONE.''' | ||
+ | |||
+ | For the orphaned files, the ones that were actually unused were from 2009 and earlier and I added a delete tag. Some weren't actually orphaned so I removed the orphaned category. | ||
+ | |||
+ | [[2009-08-12_52_13|2009-08-12_52_13]] This page can go. It's just funny so you may wanna check if before it disappears FOREVAH. | ||
+ | :Heh, thank you. In case anyone wonders, that was the test page for when I wrote the wiki features for geohashdroid. -- [[User:relet|relet]] 21:46, 1 January 2012 (EST) | ||
+ | |||
+ | '''This stuff needs to be double-checked:''' | ||
+ | |||
+ | ''Not_reached_-_Did_not_attempt'' No idea. Check the talk page. It doesn't seem consensus was reached, but it doesn't seem important anymore so probably it can go. | ||
+ | |||
+ | [[User:Thyker|User:Thyker]] It can probably go but has a bit of a strange history. BTW, what effect does deleting an user page has on the user account? | ||
+ | :None. But joannac could delete the account if that is the wish of the user. -- [[User:relet|relet]] 08:12, 2 January 2012 (EST) | ||
+ | |||
+ | ''File:200809045910-P1010665.JPG'' An orphaned file which has some categories, like 'Relet'. Can this go or not? | ||
+ | :Totally. -- [[User:relet|relet]] 08:12, 2 January 2012 (EST) | ||
+ | |||
+ | [[:Category:Siege_Engine|Category:Siege_Engine]] I am not sure if the pages in the subcategory are still relevant, but if they are I suggest moving [[:Category:Trebuchet|Category|Trebuchet]] to [[:Category:Fun stuff|Category:Fun stuff]] and removing this root category. Whadayyathink? | ||
+ | |||
+ | --- | ||
+ | |||
+ | - [[User:CO2|CO2]] 07:45, 2 January 2012 (EST) (No. This is my signature. Please do not delete my user page. :P ) | ||
− | + | I only checked a small subset of the suggested expedition pages, and all the other pages. I don't object deleting them. I also browsed trough the media, but i'm too lazy to check them all. of course, storing orphaned pictures or duplicates is a waste and it looks like someone did a great job to sort all those out. thanks a lot! -- [[User:NeThuS|NeThuS]] 04:06, 4 January 2012 (EST) |
Latest revision as of 17:27, 17 February 2023
Notes regarding pages tagged for deletion
Just for one place to put all these. Please chip in with opinions. I will remove bullet points as they are resolved.
- All the old expedition pages with various levels of detail. We need to decide which to delete, and which to keep (and remove delete tags from)
- IMHO all that is either a) replaced by a correct page or b) expedition planning (unless it is very elaborate and worth reading) -- relet 08:00, 21 May 2009 (UTC)
- See also discussion here
- I find the fact that someone once started to plan an expedition in a graticule where I am interesting, if it's the only activity for that graticule. The catalogues of "point was here, no one went" can definitely go. -Robyn 18:38, 22 May 2009 (UTC)
- See also discussion here
- Ok, this is what I'm doing for these
- Anything that has a suggestion that someone went stays.
- Anything that has some description of the hashpoint gets put on the grat page. Yes, I know this is confusing for grats that are still active. No, I don't care (unless someone has a better solution).
- Everything else gets deleted.
Comments? --joannac 05:49, 25 May 2009 (UTC)
- I think that's a good strategy; well done. -- Benjw 08:34, 25 May 2009 (UTC)
- Oh, btw, it's really time consuming and boring. So no chance of me flooding recent changes again. --joannac 05:57, 25 May 2009 (UTC)
- All that you've done already is very much appreciated, so thankyou for that. As for the rest, just do one or two every now and then; they'll get done eventually. -- Benjw 08:34, 25 May 2009 (UTC)
- That is appreciated and sensitive to what will eventually be the hallowed early history of our sport. (shovel, shovel) :-) -Robyn 22:54, 26 May 2009 (UTC)
- All that you've done already is very much appreciated, so thankyou for that. As for the rest, just do one or two every now and then; they'll get done eventually. -- Benjw 08:34, 25 May 2009 (UTC)
- Main Page - should be Main page? (yes, i'm just getting really picky now)
- Probably. And All Graticules should be All graticules. I just didn't dare to move them, because someone else's code relies on them. -- relet 08:30, 22 May 2009 (UTC)
- Set up a redirect, at least, if the code can't be changed. -- Benjw 11:34, 22 May 2009 (UTC)
- I much prefer it Main Page. Wikipedia, from where we copied our naming conventions uses Main Page, so so can we. I wouldn't object at all to All graticules, if it doesn't bother Zigdon's code. -Robyn 18:38, 22 May 2009 (UTC)
- All_Graticules is regularily read by at least three external applications. But as long as there is a redirect, they should get served the correct page through the redirect anyway. And even if that won't work for all of them, it would be work for half a minute each to fix up the applications. --Ekorren 20:19, 22 May 2009 (UTC)
- I much prefer it Main Page. Wikipedia, from where we copied our naming conventions uses Main Page, so so can we. I wouldn't object at all to All graticules, if it doesn't bother Zigdon's code. -Robyn 18:38, 22 May 2009 (UTC)
- Set up a redirect, at least, if the code can't be changed. -- Benjw 11:34, 22 May 2009 (UTC)
- Actually, I just noticed the icon links to Main Page (capital P). So I don't think we should change it unless we can change that too. --joannac 23:39, 24 May 2009 (UTC)
- I don't think you can move Main_Page without changing the code. Example, "/" redirects to "/Main_Page". This one specifically is probably not worth the hassle of changing. --davidc 23:03, 30 September 2009 (UTC)
- User:Wnvoss seems to have turned into User:Ssov, and then removed himself from almost every place he was mentioned. Should I finish removing him from the wiki (so it's like he never existed)? --joannac 06:28, 7 June 2009 (UTC)
- Would you make me have never existed if I asked? Set a precedent you want to uphold. Are you going to delete pictures he appears in? -Robyn 07:24, 7 June 2009 (UTC)
Will add more as I discover them. --joannac 01:48, 22 May 2009 (UTC)
See also User:Joannac/Todo
Deletion spree January 2012
Update: all done. Leave a note on my talk page if anything/anyone got deleted/banned in error. --joannac 17:55, 7 January 2012 (EST)
Hello all,
On my request, Joannac is gonna delete all old pages and images in this category. We got a week to check if there are no pages which wrongly have the delete tag.
To order this a bit I suggest that anyone checking some pages do so in the order they are in the category (alphabetical) and reports their progress here. I will check some if/when I got time. - CO2 18:44, 30 December 2011 (EST)
--
I am done checking everything:
Categories: DONE.
Pages: DONE.
Media: DONE.
Category:Orphaned_files: DONE.
For the orphaned files, the ones that were actually unused were from 2009 and earlier and I added a delete tag. Some weren't actually orphaned so I removed the orphaned category.
2009-08-12_52_13 This page can go. It's just funny so you may wanna check if before it disappears FOREVAH.
- Heh, thank you. In case anyone wonders, that was the test page for when I wrote the wiki features for geohashdroid. -- relet 21:46, 1 January 2012 (EST)
This stuff needs to be double-checked:
Not_reached_-_Did_not_attempt No idea. Check the talk page. It doesn't seem consensus was reached, but it doesn't seem important anymore so probably it can go.
User:Thyker It can probably go but has a bit of a strange history. BTW, what effect does deleting an user page has on the user account?
- None. But joannac could delete the account if that is the wish of the user. -- relet 08:12, 2 January 2012 (EST)
File:200809045910-P1010665.JPG An orphaned file which has some categories, like 'Relet'. Can this go or not?
- Totally. -- relet 08:12, 2 January 2012 (EST)
Category:Siege_Engine I am not sure if the pages in the subcategory are still relevant, but if they are I suggest moving Category|Trebuchet to Category:Fun stuff and removing this root category. Whadayyathink?
---
- CO2 07:45, 2 January 2012 (EST) (No. This is my signature. Please do not delete my user page. :P )
I only checked a small subset of the suggested expedition pages, and all the other pages. I don't object deleting them. I also browsed trough the media, but i'm too lazy to check them all. of course, storing orphaned pictures or duplicates is a waste and it looks like someone did a great job to sort all those out. thanks a lot! -- NeThuS 04:06, 4 January 2012 (EST)