Difference between revisions of "Category talk:Tagged for deletion"
From Geohashing
imported>Antior (→Deletion spree January 2012: new section) |
imported>Antior m (Signature fail) |
||
Line 39: | Line 39: | ||
On my request, Joannac is gonna delete all old pages and images in this category. We got a week to check if there are no pages which wrongly have the delete tag. | On my request, Joannac is gonna delete all old pages and images in this category. We got a week to check if there are no pages which wrongly have the delete tag. | ||
− | To order this a bit I suggest that anyone checking some pages do so in the order they are in the category (alphabetical) and reports their progress here. I will check some if/when I got time. 18: | + | To order this a bit I suggest that anyone checking some pages do so in the order they are in the category (alphabetical) and reports their progress here. I will check some if/when I got time. - [[User:Antior|Antior]] 18:44, 30 December 2011 (EST) |
Revision as of 23:44, 30 December 2011
Notes regarding pages tagged for deletion
Just for one place to put all these. Please chip in with opinions. I will remove bullet points as they are resolved.
- All the old expedition pages with various levels of detail. We need to decide which to delete, and which to keep (and remove delete tags from)
- IMHO all that is either a) replaced by a correct page or b) expedition planning (unless it is very elaborate and worth reading) -- relet 08:00, 21 May 2009 (UTC)
- See also discussion here
- I find the fact that someone once started to plan an expedition in a graticule where I am interesting, if it's the only activity for that graticule. The catalogues of "point was here, no one went" can definitely go. -Robyn 18:38, 22 May 2009 (UTC)
- See also discussion here
- Ok, this is what I'm doing for these
- Anything that has a suggestion that someone went stays.
- Anything that has some description of the hashpoint gets put on the grat page. Yes, I know this is confusing for grats that are still active. No, I don't care (unless someone has a better solution).
- Everything else gets deleted.
Comments? --joannac 05:49, 25 May 2009 (UTC)
- I think that's a good strategy; well done. -- Benjw 08:34, 25 May 2009 (UTC)
- Oh, btw, it's really time consuming and boring. So no chance of me flooding recent changes again. --joannac 05:57, 25 May 2009 (UTC)
- All that you've done already is very much appreciated, so thankyou for that. As for the rest, just do one or two every now and then; they'll get done eventually. -- Benjw 08:34, 25 May 2009 (UTC)
- That is appreciated and sensitive to what will eventually be the hallowed early history of our sport. (shovel, shovel) :-) -Robyn 22:54, 26 May 2009 (UTC)
- All that you've done already is very much appreciated, so thankyou for that. As for the rest, just do one or two every now and then; they'll get done eventually. -- Benjw 08:34, 25 May 2009 (UTC)
- Probably. And All Graticules should be All graticules. I just didn't dare to move them, because someone else's code relies on them. -- relet 08:30, 22 May 2009 (UTC)
- Set up a redirect, at least, if the code can't be changed. -- Benjw 11:34, 22 May 2009 (UTC)
- I much prefer it Main Page. Wikipedia, from where we copied our naming conventions uses Main Page, so so can we. I wouldn't object at all to All graticules, if it doesn't bother Zigdon's code. -Robyn 18:38, 22 May 2009 (UTC)
- All_Graticules is regularily read by at least three external applications. But as long as there is a redirect, they should get served the correct page through the redirect anyway. And even if that won't work for all of them, it would be work for half a minute each to fix up the applications. --Ekorren 20:19, 22 May 2009 (UTC)
- I much prefer it Main Page. Wikipedia, from where we copied our naming conventions uses Main Page, so so can we. I wouldn't object at all to All graticules, if it doesn't bother Zigdon's code. -Robyn 18:38, 22 May 2009 (UTC)
- Set up a redirect, at least, if the code can't be changed. -- Benjw 11:34, 22 May 2009 (UTC)
- Actually, I just noticed the icon links to Main Page (capital P). So I don't think we should change it unless we can change that too. --joannac 23:39, 24 May 2009 (UTC)
- I don't think you can move Main_Page without changing the code. Example, "/" redirects to "/Main_Page". This one specifically is probably not worth the hassle of changing. --davidc 23:03, 30 September 2009 (UTC)
- User:Wnvoss seems to have turned into User:Ssov, and then removed himself from almost every place he was mentioned. Should I finish removing him from the wiki (so it's like he never existed)? --joannac 06:28, 7 June 2009 (UTC)
- Would you make me have never existed if I asked? Set a precedent you want to uphold. Are you going to delete pictures he appears in? -Robyn 07:24, 7 June 2009 (UTC)
Will add more as I discover them. --joannac 01:48, 22 May 2009 (UTC)
See also User:Joannac/Todo
Deletion spree January 2012
Hello all,
On my request, Joannac is gonna delete all old pages and images in this category. We got a week to check if there are no pages which wrongly have the delete tag.
To order this a bit I suggest that anyone checking some pages do so in the order they are in the category (alphabetical) and reports their progress here. I will check some if/when I got time. - Antior 18:44, 30 December 2011 (EST)