Difference between revisions of "Talk:Stacking achievement"

From Geohashing
imported>The ru
m
imported>Robyn
(S'good.)
Line 7: Line 7:
 
*'''support''' Climbing one of the frequently occurring hashtrees would also count, right? --[[User:HiroProtagonist|HiroProtagonist]] 15:32, 14 January 2010 (UTC)
 
*'''support''' Climbing one of the frequently occurring hashtrees would also count, right? --[[User:HiroProtagonist|HiroProtagonist]] 15:32, 14 January 2010 (UTC)
 
*'''Do not oppose''', although "simultaneous GPS dancers" doesn't sound very fun to me. Building a human pyramid at the hashpoint would be more fun, especially in public locations (though maybe that would fall under [[Circus Geohash]]. --[[User:The ru|The ru]] 12:32, 2 February 2010 (UTC)
 
*'''Do not oppose''', although "simultaneous GPS dancers" doesn't sound very fun to me. Building a human pyramid at the hashpoint would be more fun, especially in public locations (though maybe that would fall under [[Circus Geohash]]. --[[User:The ru|The ru]] 12:32, 2 February 2010 (UTC)
 +
*'''Support''' - I think the top of cliff/bottom of cliff rule is pretty strict: I would have allowed anything within the circle, but if those are the rules as written, it's fair. The two metre rule is good. That allows tree climbing. -[[User:Robyn|Robyn]] 05:06, 15 February 2010 (UTC)

Revision as of 05:06, 15 February 2010

This is a proposal made on 2009-10-17. Please leave comments and suggestions below, indicating whether you:
  • Support the proposal
  • Do not oppose it
  • Oppose (this option requires you to watch the page and return to comment on modifications), or
  • Think it Needs work before you can decide.

See Proposed achievements for more information on this process.

  • support. I like the idea. Might need to clarify what is the minimum altitude difference between two "levels", and whether you are allowed to bring (ladders/bridges/buildings) to gain the achievement -- relet 17:15, 17 October 2009 (UTC)
Clarified the wording as requested. --davidc 17:43, 17 October 2009 (UTC)
  • support. ilpadre, Fluxkompensator, Mo6eB, his friends and me already did this on today's expedition. Current rules are acceptable, imho. Koepfel talk 18:08, 14 November 2009 (UTC)
  • Do not oppose. Seems like a reasonable achievement definition, but it doesn't seem like it will get achieved very often at all. We can try it and see what happens. Jiml 02:03, 15 November 2009 (UTC)
  • support Climbing one of the frequently occurring hashtrees would also count, right? --HiroProtagonist 15:32, 14 January 2010 (UTC)
  • Do not oppose, although "simultaneous GPS dancers" doesn't sound very fun to me. Building a human pyramid at the hashpoint would be more fun, especially in public locations (though maybe that would fall under Circus Geohash. --The ru 12:32, 2 February 2010 (UTC)
  • Support - I think the top of cliff/bottom of cliff rule is pretty strict: I would have allowed anything within the circle, but if those are the rules as written, it's fair. The two metre rule is good. That allows tree climbing. -Robyn 05:06, 15 February 2010 (UTC)