Difference between revisions of "User talk:Houseofmew"
From Geohashing
imported>Robyn (A group of users is like a user. Precedent: the Relentles Haberdashers.) |
imported>Relet m |
||
| (6 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
I think this should be moved to a User page. -[[User:Robyn|Robyn]] 20:10, 28 February 2009 (UTC) | I think this should be moved to a User page. -[[User:Robyn|Robyn]] 20:10, 28 February 2009 (UTC) | ||
| + | :And three months later I still think so, so I moved it to the User namespace. It shouldn't affect anything to the negative, and will allow you to receive Houseofmew messages should you wish. -[[User:Robyn|Robyn]] 04:51, 20 May 2009 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | Hrm, since the user doesn't actually exist, a user page is probably inappropriate. Do they really need their own page? --[[User:Joannac|joannac]] 05:03, 20 May 2009 (UTC) | ||
| + | :[[User:ReletBot]] has a page... ;-) -- [[User:Benjw|Benjw]] 05:05, 20 May 2009 (UTC) | ||
| + | ::And a user account, which has bot privileges, so as to not appear in the recent changes. -- [[User:relet|relet]] 08:17, 20 May 2009 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | Arguments for having an own page for a group: | ||
| + | *they want to track achievements collectively rather than (or in addition to) as individuals | ||
| + | *they will set up a collective e-mail so they all get notifications of page changes here | ||
| + | *they like annoying Joannac. | ||
| + | -[[User:Robyn|Robyn]] 05:20, 20 May 2009 (UTC) | ||
| + | :Argument against creating it in the user namespace: Someone could register the name as user account and claim the page. Best would probably to register a group account as well. That could even allow group edits and group notifications. :] edit: I just realize that you probably meant this as well, Robyn. -- [[User:relet|relet]] 08:17, 20 May 2009 (UTC) | ||
Latest revision as of 08:18, 20 May 2009
I think this should be moved to a User page. -Robyn 20:10, 28 February 2009 (UTC)
- And three months later I still think so, so I moved it to the User namespace. It shouldn't affect anything to the negative, and will allow you to receive Houseofmew messages should you wish. -Robyn 04:51, 20 May 2009 (UTC)
Hrm, since the user doesn't actually exist, a user page is probably inappropriate. Do they really need their own page? --joannac 05:03, 20 May 2009 (UTC)
- User:ReletBot has a page... ;-) -- Benjw 05:05, 20 May 2009 (UTC)
- And a user account, which has bot privileges, so as to not appear in the recent changes. -- relet 08:17, 20 May 2009 (UTC)
Arguments for having an own page for a group:
- they want to track achievements collectively rather than (or in addition to) as individuals
- they will set up a collective e-mail so they all get notifications of page changes here
- they like annoying Joannac.
-Robyn 05:20, 20 May 2009 (UTC)
- Argument against creating it in the user namespace: Someone could register the name as user account and claim the page. Best would probably to register a group account as well. That could even allow group edits and group notifications. :] edit: I just realize that you probably meant this as well, Robyn. -- relet 08:17, 20 May 2009 (UTC)
